PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSMY vs. GDXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSMY vs. GDXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMY achieves a 30.47% return, which is significantly higher than GDXY's -18.85% return.


TSMY

1D
0.66%
1M
-4.22%
6M
21.94%
YTD
30.47%
1Y
60.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
42.46%

GDXY

1D
-2.75%
1M
-3.94%
6M
-22.61%
YTD
-18.85%
1Y
13.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.52M$4.39M$7.85M
$2.14M$3.13M$3.04M

TSMY vs. GDXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
30.47%41.00%8.05%
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
-18.85%88.08%-12.53%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMY and GDXY is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

0.23

The correlation between TSMY and GDXY shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSMY vs. GDXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSMY
TSMY Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXY
GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSMY vs. GDXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSMYGDXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.10

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

0.39

+2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.72

0.85

+9.87

TSMY vs. GDXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the GDXY Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMY and GDXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSMY vs. GDXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMY drawdown since its inception was -31.15%, smaller than the maximum GDXY drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMY and GDXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMYGDXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.15%

-36.99%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.86%

-36.99%

+19.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.66%

-34.85%

+23.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-8.31%

+2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

17.02%

-11.69%

Volatility

TSMY vs. GDXY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) has a higher volatility of 11.98% compared to YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) at 9.85%. This indicates that TSMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMYGDXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.98%

9.85%

+2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.90%

33.12%

-5.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.77%

39.36%

-5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.64%

32.57%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.64%

32.57%

+2.07%

TSMY vs. GDXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXY's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSMY vs. GDXY - Dividend Comparison

TSMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.31%, less than GDXY's 88.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
88.00%52.13%23.91%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
58.31%56.76%13.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSMY and GDXY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMY has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to GDXY (9.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMY dropped -31.15% vs GDXY's -36.99%.

On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 60.64% vs 13.14% for GDXY. On fees, TSMY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, GDXY has been the lower-risk option at 9.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 60.64% return vs 13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for GDXY.

GDXY has the higher dividend yield at 88.00%, compared with 58.31% for TSMY.

TSMY is categorized as Derivative Income, while GDXY is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TSMY and 1.08% for GDXY.

TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSMY and GDXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer