PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSMY vs. GDXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSMY vs. GDXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMY achieves a 38.94% return, which is significantly higher than GDXY's -4.46% return.


TSMY

1D
1.56%
1M
9.89%
YTD
38.94%
6M
42.47%
1Y
96.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDXY

1D
1.34%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
-4.46%
6M
-0.57%
1Y
33.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMY vs. GDXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
38.94%41.00%8.15%
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
-4.46%88.08%-12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMY and GDXY is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSMY vs. GDXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMY
TSMY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXY
GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMY vs. GDXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSMYGDXYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.38

0.91

+2.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.00

1.26

+2.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.19

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.40

1.33

+5.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.81

3.44

+20.36

TSMY vs. GDXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMY Sharpe Ratio is 3.38, which is higher than the GDXY Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMY and GDXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSMYGDXYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38

0.91

+2.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

0.81

+0.78

Drawdowns

TSMY vs. GDXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMY drawdown since its inception was -31.15%, which is greater than GDXY's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMY and GDXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMYGDXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.15%

-28.03%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-28.03%

+12.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-23.30%

+23.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-6.37%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

10.84%

-6.67%

Volatility

TSMY vs. GDXY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) is 9.35%, while YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) has a volatility of 11.54%. This indicates that TSMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMYGDXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.35%

11.54%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.65%

30.82%

-8.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.83%

36.60%

-7.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.23%

31.71%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.23%

31.71%

+1.52%

TSMY vs. GDXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TSMY and GDXY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

TSMY vs. GDXY - Dividend Comparison

TSMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.48%, less than GDXY's 72.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
72.42%52.13%23.91%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
51.48%56.76%13.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSMY and GDXY have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXY has higher volatility (11.54%) compared to TSMY (9.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMY dropped -31.15% vs GDXY's -28.03%.

On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 96.92% vs 33.12% for GDXY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, TSMY has been the lower-risk option at 9.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 96.92% return vs 33.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMY and GDXY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

GDXY has the higher dividend yield at 72.42%, compared with 51.48% for TSMY.

TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSMY and GDXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer