TSMX vs. MUU
TSMX (Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. TSMX is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSMX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
TSMX vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TSMX
- 1D
- -13.50%
- 1M
- 12.92%
- YTD
- 80.35%
- 6M
- 88.28%
- 1Y
- 240.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMX vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | -3.52% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMX and MUU is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMX vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
TSMX
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSMX vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSMX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.13 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSMX vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMX drawdown since its inception was -63.80%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMX and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.80% | -26.28% | -37.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.50% | -26.28% | +12.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.59% | -10.19% | -5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.90% | — | — |
Volatility
TSMX vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.69% | 295.32% | -218.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.69% | 295.32% | -212.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.69% | 295.32% | -212.63% |
TSMX vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMX vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
TSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 4.58% | 8.01% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, TSMX and MUU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSMX.
TSMX has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSMX and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for TSMX and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer