PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSMWX vs. PRSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSMWX vs. PRSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund (TSMWX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMWX achieves a 21.10% return, which is significantly higher than PRSVX's 17.21% return.


TSMWX

1D
0.90%
1M
4.97%
YTD
21.10%
6M
21.18%
1Y
41.23%
3Y*
24.41%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*

PRSVX

1D
1.18%
1M
3.66%
YTD
17.21%
6M
16.14%
1Y
32.70%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
10.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMWX vs. PRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSMWX
TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund
21.10%16.07%18.33%20.97%-16.46%32.06%15.98%30.01%-7.82%17.44%
PRSVX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund
17.21%8.31%10.84%12.34%-18.53%25.47%12.49%25.82%-11.58%12.54%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMWX and PRSVX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.94

The correlation between TSMWX and PRSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSMWX vs. PRSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMWX
TSMWX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TSMWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PRSVX
PRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMWX vs. PRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund (TSMWX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSMWXPRSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.37

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

3.98

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.76

14.83

+3.93

TSMWX vs. PRSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the PRSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMWX and PRSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSMWXPRSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.13

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.33

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.64

+0.02

Drawdowns

TSMWX vs. PRSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMWX drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, smaller than the maximum PRSVX drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMWX and PRSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMWXPRSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.34%

-55.37%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-8.93%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.27%

-24.60%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.87%

-28.17%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-7.49%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.37%

-0.07%

Volatility

TSMWX vs. PRSVX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund (TSMWX) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX) at 4.49%. This indicates that TSMWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMWXPRSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

4.49%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

12.31%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.75%

16.70%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.71%

19.79%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.28%

21.03%

+1.25%

TSMWX vs. PRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMWX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than PRSVX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSMWX vs. PRSVX - Dividend Comparison

TSMWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, less than PRSVX's 10.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRSVX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund
10.09%11.83%9.77%3.27%5.28%6.98%2.03%4.59%9.46%3.79%3.77%22.55%
TSMWX
TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund
7.37%8.92%12.84%2.50%7.84%20.81%1.81%5.84%13.26%4.51%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSMWX and PRSVX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMWX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to PRSVX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMWX dropped -44.34% vs PRSVX's -55.37%.

TSMWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSMWX and PRSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer