PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSMWX vs. IVOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSMWX vs. IVOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund (TSMWX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMWX achieves a 20.01% return, which is significantly higher than IVOG's 18.93% return.


TSMWX

1D
-0.11%
1M
3.86%
YTD
20.01%
6M
21.23%
1Y
41.62%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*

IVOG

1D
0.64%
1M
5.56%
YTD
18.93%
6M
19.48%
1Y
31.58%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMWX vs. IVOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSMWX
TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund
20.01%16.07%18.33%20.97%-16.46%32.06%15.98%30.01%-7.82%17.44%
IVOG
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
18.93%7.34%15.62%17.36%-19.08%18.85%22.60%26.13%-10.58%19.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMWX and IVOG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.96

The correlation between TSMWX and IVOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSMWX vs. IVOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMWX
TSMWX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TSMWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOG
IVOG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IVOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMWX vs. IVOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund (TSMWX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSMWXIVOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

1.85

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.25

2.64

+0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.32

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.81

3.20

+1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.36

12.59

+5.77

TSMWX vs. IVOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the IVOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMWX and IVOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSMWXIVOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.85

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.43

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.64

+0.01

Drawdowns

TSMWX vs. IVOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMWX drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, which is greater than IVOG's maximum drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMWX and IVOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMWXIVOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.34%

-39.32%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-9.69%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.27%

-25.61%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.87%

-29.31%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

0.00%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-5.88%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.46%

-0.16%

Volatility

TSMWX vs. IVOG - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund (TSMWX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) have volatilities of 5.16% and 5.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMWXIVOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

5.19%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

13.21%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.77%

17.15%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.71%

20.61%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

20.59%

+1.70%

TSMWX vs. IVOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMWX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOG's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSMWX vs. IVOG - Dividend Comparison

TSMWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, more than IVOG's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOG
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
0.54%0.64%0.79%1.15%1.05%0.47%0.74%1.17%1.01%0.93%1.11%1.04%
TSMWX
TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund
7.43%8.92%12.84%2.50%7.84%20.81%1.81%5.84%13.26%4.51%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TSMWX and IVOG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVOG has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to TSMWX (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMWX dropped -44.34% vs IVOG's -39.32%.

TSMWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSMWX and IVOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer