TSMWX vs. FTHSX
TSMWX (TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund) and FTHSX (FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TSMWX returned 13.19%/yr vs 13.57%/yr for FTHSX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TSMWX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for FTHSX.
Performance
TSMWX vs. FTHSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSMWX achieves a 25.49% return, which is significantly higher than FTHSX's 20.71% return.
TSMWX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 20.13%
- YTD
- 25.49%
- 1Y
- 37.34%
- 3Y*
- 22.57%
- 5Y*
- 13.19%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.81%
FTHSX
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 1Y
- 29.85%
- 3Y*
- 19.88%
- 5Y*
- 13.57%
- 10Y*
- 14.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TSMWX vs. FTHSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSMWX TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund | 25.49% | 16.07% | 18.33% | 20.97% | -16.46% | 32.06% | 15.98% | 30.01% | -7.82% | 17.44% |
FTHSX FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I | 20.71% | 12.02% | 16.17% | 22.55% | -7.49% | 30.83% | 10.38% | 28.06% | -13.18% | 17.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMWX and FTHSX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between TSMWX and FTHSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMWX vs. FTHSX — Risk / Return Rank
TSMWX
FTHSX
TSMWX vs. FTHSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund (TSMWX) and FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I (FTHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSMWX | FTHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.37 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.32 | 3.31 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.20 | 11.93 | +3.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSMWX vs. FTHSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMWX drawdown since its inception was -44.34%, which is greater than FTHSX's maximum drawdown of -37.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMWX and FTHSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMWX | FTHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.34% | -37.74% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -9.42% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.27% | -24.58% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.87% | -24.58% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | 0.00% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -5.56% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 2.61% | -0.13% |
Volatility
TSMWX vs. FTHSX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund (TSMWX) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I (FTHSX) at 3.91%. This indicates that TSMWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMWX | FTHSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | 3.91% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.26% | 10.85% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.70% | 14.95% | +3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 18.80% | +2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.23% | 20.08% | +2.15% |
TSMWX vs. FTHSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMWX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHSX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMWX vs. FTHSX - Dividend Comparison
TSMWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, more than FTHSX's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTHSX FullerThaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I | 0.45% | 0.54% | 8.05% | 1.81% | 1.23% | 3.77% | 0.35% | 0.39% | 0.55% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 15.40% |
TSMWX TIAA-CREF Quant Small/Mid-Cap Equity Fund | 7.11% | 8.92% | 12.84% | 2.50% | 7.84% | 20.81% | 1.81% | 5.84% | 13.26% | 4.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMWX and FTHSX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMWX has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to FTHSX (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMWX dropped -44.34% vs FTHSX's -37.74%.
FTHSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSMWX and FTHSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer