PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSMU vs. XTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSMU vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMU achieves a 76.82% return, which is significantly higher than XTAP's 10.29% return.


TSMU

1D
-13.58%
1M
12.60%
YTD
76.82%
6M
84.23%
1Y
224.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTAP

1D
-0.56%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
10.29%
6M
10.43%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMU vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSMU
GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF
76.82%74.83%3.55%
XTAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF
10.29%17.58%0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMU and XTAP is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2024

0.56

The correlation between TSMU and XTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

TSMU vs. XTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TSMU
XTAP

Technology

66.6%
35.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Technology

TSMU
66.6%
XTAP
35.7%

Basic Materials

TSMU

-

XTAP
1.8%

Communication Services

TSMU

-

XTAP
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TSMU

-

XTAP
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

TSMU

-

XTAP
4.9%

Energy

TSMU

-

XTAP
3.5%

Financial Services

TSMU

-

XTAP
11.6%

Healthcare

TSMU

-

XTAP
8.5%

Industrials

TSMU

-

XTAP
8.3%

Real Estate

TSMU

-

XTAP
1.9%

Utilities

TSMU

-

XTAP
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSMU vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMU
TSMU Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TSMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMU Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMU Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

XTAP
XTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMU vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSMUXTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

2.05

-0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.43

11.34

-4.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.44

62.48

-42.04

TSMU vs. XTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the XTAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMU and XTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSMU vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMU drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMU and XTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMUXTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.73%

-22.13%

-41.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.18%

-1.72%

-33.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.58%

-0.91%

-12.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.71%

-3.42%

-12.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.05%

0.31%

+10.74%

Volatility

TSMU vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) has a higher volatility of 32.59% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 2.05%. This indicates that TSMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMUXTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.59%

2.05%

+30.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.71%

3.72%

+55.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.25%

4.83%

+71.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.32%

14.55%

+67.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.32%

14.36%

+67.96%

TSMU vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSMU vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSMU nor XTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TSMU and XTAP have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMU has higher volatility (32.59%) compared to XTAP (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMU dropped -63.73% vs XTAP's -22.13%.

On 1-year performance, TSMU leads with 224.68% vs 19.37% for XTAP. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMU has performed better with a 224.68% return vs 19.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSMU.

TSMU and XTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSMU and 0.79% for XTAP.

XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.06 vs 2.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSMU and XTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer