PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSMU vs. TSDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSMU vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMU achieves a 82.73% return, which is significantly higher than TSDD's -4.27% return.


TSMU

1D
-3.86%
1M
16.16%
YTD
82.73%
6M
90.80%
1Y
276.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSDD

1D
0.14%
1M
-17.41%
YTD
-4.27%
6M
-7.92%
1Y
-62.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMU vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSMU
GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF
82.73%74.83%3.04%
TSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF
-4.27%-74.84%-42.07%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMU and TSDD is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024

-0.39

TSMU vs. TSDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TSMU
TSDD

Technology

66.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

200.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TSMU
66.6%
TSDD

-

Basic Materials

TSMU

-

TSDD

-

Communication Services

TSMU

-

TSDD

-

Consumer Cyclical

TSMU

-

TSDD
200.1%

Consumer Defensive

TSMU

-

TSDD

-

Energy

TSMU

-

TSDD

-

Financial Services

TSMU

-

TSDD

-

Healthcare

TSMU

-

TSDD

-

Industrials

TSMU

-

TSDD

-

Real Estate

TSMU

-

TSDD

-

Utilities

TSMU

-

TSDD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSMU vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMU
TSMU Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TSMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMU Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMU Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TSDD
TSDD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMU vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSMUTSDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.90

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.91

-0.83

+8.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.63

-1.05

+26.68

TSMU vs. TSDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMU Sharpe Ratio is 3.91, which is higher than the TSDD Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMU and TSDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSMUTSDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.91

-0.68

+4.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

-0.66

+2.11

Drawdowns

TSMU vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMU drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMU and TSDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMUTSDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.73%

-99.03%

+35.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.18%

-76.12%

+40.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.86%

-98.90%

+95.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.00%

-71.21%

+55.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.83%

59.88%

-49.05%

Volatility

TSMU vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) is 22.60%, while GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a volatility of 24.19%. This indicates that TSMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMUTSDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.60%

24.19%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.16%

54.90%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.26%

92.57%

-21.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.45%

114.46%

-34.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.45%

114.46%

-34.01%

TSMU vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TSMU and TSDD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

TSMU vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison

TSMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%.


PositionTTM202520242023
TSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF
8.80%8.42%0.00%24.84%
TSMU
GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSMU and TSDD have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSDD has higher volatility (24.19%) compared to TSMU (22.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMU dropped -63.73% vs TSDD's -99.03%.

On 1-year performance, TSMU leads with 276.19% vs -62.89% for TSDD. Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. On volatility, TSMU has been the lower-risk option at 22.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMU has performed better with a 276.19% return vs -62.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMU and TSDD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 0.00% for TSMU.

TSMU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSDD is Inverse Equities.

TSMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSMU and TSDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer