TSMU vs. NTSD
TSMU (GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSMU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
TSMU vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TSMU
- 1D
- 4.32%
- 1M
- 22.68%
- YTD
- 90.07%
- 6M
- 102.38%
- 1Y
- 302.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 6.98%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMU vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF | 62.52% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMU and NTSD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMU vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
TSMU
NTSD
TSMU vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSMU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.28 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.83 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.85 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.75 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSMU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 5.75 | -4.23 |
Drawdowns
TSMU vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMU drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMU and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.73% | -5.20% | -58.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.04% | -0.84% | -15.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.83% | — | — |
Volatility
TSMU vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMU | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.13% | 24.31% | +46.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.48% | 24.31% | +56.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.48% | 24.31% | +56.17% |
TSMU vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMU vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSMU nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMU and NTSD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSMU.
TSMU and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSMU and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for TSMU and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer