TSMG vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSMG returned 297.71% vs 6074.28% for MULL. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

TSMG vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMG achieves a 86.06% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.

TSMG

• 1D: -4.26%
• 1M: 15.77%
• YTD: 86.06%
• 6M: 95.35%
• 1Y: 297.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: 216.81%
• YTD: 936.86%
• 6M: 1,369.93%
• 1Y: 6,074.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMG vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF	86.06%	76.34%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	936.86%	401.87%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMG and MULL is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025	0.58

The correlation between TSMG and MULL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSMG vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMG

TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 89
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 76
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 94

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMG vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSMG	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.18	46.71	-42.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	7.02	-3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.89	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.50	116.34	-107.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.74	390.40	-362.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSMG vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMG Sharpe Ratio is 4.18, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 46.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMG and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSMG	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.18	46.71	-42.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.69	7.45	-5.76

Drawdowns

TSMG vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMG drawdown since its inception was -63.67%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMG and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSMG	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.67%	-72.29%	+8.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.29%	-53.09%	+17.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.26%	0.00%	-4.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.98%	-20.62%	+3.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.79%	15.79%	-5.00%

Volatility

TSMG vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) is 23.14%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that TSMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSMG	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.14%	55.41%	-32.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.07%	105.59%	-50.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.74%	132.38%	-60.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.06%	136.22%	-55.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.06%	136.22%	-55.16%

TSMG vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSMG vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

TSMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF	6.17%	11.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSMG and MULL in my portfolio?

TSMG and MULL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSMG or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to TSMG (23.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMG dropped -63.67% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, TSMG or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs 297.71% for TSMG. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TSMG has been the lower-risk option at 23.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSMG or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs 297.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSMG or MULL?

TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSMG or MULL?

TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

What is the main difference between TSMG and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TSMG and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs 4.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.