PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSME vs. TUSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSME vs. TUSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) and Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSME achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly higher than TUSB's 1.88% return.


TSME

1D
1.90%
1M
2.79%
YTD
16.94%
6M
18.66%
1Y
40.22%
3Y*
21.81%
5Y*
10Y*

TUSB

1D
0.01%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.88%
6M
2.24%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSME vs. TUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSME
Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF
16.94%10.42%
TUSB
Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF
1.88%4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TSME and TUSB is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSME vs. TUSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSME
TSME Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TSME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSME Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSME Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TSME Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSME Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

TUSB
TUSB Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSME vs. TUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) and Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSMETUSBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

5.22

-3.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.68

9.41

-6.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

2.31

-0.98

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

19.34

-16.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.10

83.20

-74.09

TSME vs. TUSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSME Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the TUSB Sharpe Ratio of 5.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSME and TUSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSMETUSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

5.22

-3.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

3.82

-2.92

Drawdowns

TSME vs. TUSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSME drawdown since its inception was -26.59%, which is greater than TUSB's maximum drawdown of -0.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSME and TUSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMETUSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.59%

-0.51%

-26.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.72%

-0.25%

-14.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.03%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-0.06%

-5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

0.06%

+4.23%

Volatility

TSME vs. TUSB - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB) at 0.31%. This indicates that TSME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMETUSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.63%

0.31%

+7.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.08%

0.65%

+16.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.15%

0.92%

+20.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.69%

1.25%

+20.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.69%

1.25%

+20.44%

TSME vs. TUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TUSB's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSME vs. TUSB - Dividend Comparison

TSME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than TUSB's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TSME
Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF
0.14%0.17%0.38%0.53%0.16%
TUSB
Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF
4.26%3.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSME and TUSB have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSME has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to TUSB (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSME dropped -26.59% vs TUSB's -0.51%.

On 1-year performance, TSME leads with 40.22% vs 4.76% for TUSB. On fees, TUSB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, TUSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSME has performed better with a 40.22% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TUSB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSME.

TUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 0.14% for TSME.

TSME is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while TUSB is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSME and 0.20% for TUSB.

TUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.22 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSME and TUSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer