TSME vs. SPMD
TSME (Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF) and SPMD (SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. TSME is actively managed, while SPMD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSME returned 21.81%/yr vs 16.18%/yr for SPMD. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSME charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPMD.
Performance
TSME vs. SPMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSME achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly higher than SPMD's 14.25% return.
TSME
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 6M
- 18.66%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 21.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMD
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 14.25%
- 6M
- 15.29%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.34%
- 10Y*
- 11.52%
TSME vs. SPMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSME Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF | 16.94% | 13.79% | 18.98% | 17.82% | 2.41% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 14.25% | 7.44% | 13.91% | 16.48% | 4.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSME and SPMD is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between TSME and SPMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSME vs. SPMD — Risk / Return Rank
TSME
SPMD
TSME vs. SPMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSME | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 1.75 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 2.54 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.31 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 3.04 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.10 | 11.20 | -2.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSME | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.75 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.45 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
TSME vs. SPMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSME drawdown since its inception was -26.59%, smaller than the maximum SPMD drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSME and SPMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSME | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.59% | -57.62% | +31.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.72% | -8.86% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.59% | -24.08% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -8.12% | +2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 2.41% | +1.88% |
Volatility
TSME vs. SPMD - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) at 4.44%. This indicates that TSME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSME | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 4.44% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.08% | 11.38% | +5.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.15% | 15.57% | +5.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 19.70% | +1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 21.19% | +0.50% |
TSME vs. SPMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMD's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSME vs. SPMD - Dividend Comparison
TSME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SPMD's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 1.23% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.24% | 1.30% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 5.33% |
TSME Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.38% | 0.53% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSME and SPMD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSME has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to SPMD (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSME dropped -26.59% vs SPMD's -57.62%.
On 3-year performance, TSME leads with 21.81% vs 16.18% for SPMD. On fees, SPMD is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TSME has performed better with a 21.81% return vs 16.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMD is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSME.
SPMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.14% for TSME.
They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSME and 0.05% for SPMD.
TSME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSME and SPMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer