PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSME vs. PEXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSME vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSME achieves a 16.53% return, which is significantly lower than PEXL's 23.12% return.


TSME

1D
-0.35%
1M
3.31%
YTD
16.53%
6M
17.22%
1Y
36.32%
3Y*
21.67%
5Y*
10Y*

PEXL

1D
0.57%
1M
12.19%
YTD
23.12%
6M
24.66%
1Y
53.95%
3Y*
22.51%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSME vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TSME
Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF
16.53%13.79%18.98%17.82%2.41%
PEXL
Pacer US Export Leaders ETF
23.12%27.33%5.79%24.40%5.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TSME and PEXL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022

0.88

The correlation between TSME and PEXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

TSME vs. PEXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TSME
PEXL

Industrials

29.0%
6.4%

Technology

21.2%
55.1%

Consumer Cyclical

19.9%
4.3%

Financial Services

8.6%

-

Healthcare

7.6%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
6.3%

Basic Materials

4.6%
4.2%

Utilities

2.5%

-

Energy

1.8%
1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

TSME
29.0%
PEXL
6.4%

Technology

TSME
21.2%
PEXL
55.1%

Consumer Cyclical

TSME
19.9%
PEXL
4.3%

Financial Services

TSME
8.6%
PEXL

-

Healthcare

TSME
7.6%
PEXL
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

TSME
4.9%
PEXL
6.3%

Basic Materials

TSME
4.6%
PEXL
4.2%

Utilities

TSME
2.5%
PEXL

-

Energy

TSME
1.8%
PEXL
1.1%

Communication Services

TSME

-

PEXL
15.1%

Real Estate

TSME

-

PEXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSME vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSME
TSME Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TSME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSME Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSME Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TSME Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSME Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

PEXL
PEXL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PEXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEXL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PEXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEXL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSME vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSMEPEXLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

3.05

-1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

4.00

-1.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.51

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

4.74

-2.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.50

20.42

-11.93

TSME vs. PEXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSME Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the PEXL Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSME and PEXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSMEPEXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

3.05

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.65

+0.24

Drawdowns

TSME vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSME drawdown since its inception was -26.59%, smaller than the maximum PEXL drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSME and PEXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMEPEXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.59%

-36.76%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.72%

-11.43%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.59%

-24.72%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

0.00%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-6.72%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

2.65%

+1.64%

Volatility

TSME vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) at 5.25%. This indicates that TSME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMEPEXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

5.25%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.07%

13.10%

+3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.13%

17.80%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.68%

21.86%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.68%

24.04%

-2.36%

TSME vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PEXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSME vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison

TSME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than PEXL's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PEXL
Pacer US Export Leaders ETF
0.34%0.44%0.48%0.48%0.60%0.22%0.48%0.49%0.29%
TSME
Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF
0.14%0.17%0.38%0.53%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSME and PEXL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSME has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to PEXL (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSME dropped -26.59% vs PEXL's -36.76%.

On 3-year performance, PEXL leads with 22.51% vs 21.67% for TSME. On fees, PEXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PEXL has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PEXL has performed better with a 22.51% return vs 21.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSME.

PEXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.14% for TSME.

They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSME and 0.60% for PEXL.

PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSME and PEXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer