PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSMDX vs. SWMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSMDX vs. SWMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund (TSMDX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMDX achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than SWMCX's 12.44% return.


TSMDX

1D
0.58%
1M
2.90%
YTD
6.36%
6M
7.48%
1Y
15.48%
3Y*
9.37%
5Y*
3.48%
10Y*
8.64%

SWMCX

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.80%
YTD
12.44%
6M
11.90%
1Y
22.04%
3Y*
17.36%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMDX vs. SWMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSMDX
Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund
6.36%7.85%7.73%9.42%-17.85%23.18%15.93%25.84%-13.14%0.32%
SWMCX
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund
12.44%10.54%15.28%17.20%-17.31%22.55%17.03%30.46%-9.16%0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMDX and SWMCX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between TSMDX and SWMCX has dropped to 0.68 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSMDX vs. SWMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMDX
TSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SWMCX
SWMCX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SWMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SWMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMDX vs. SWMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund (TSMDX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSMDXSWMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.68

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.69

10.30

-3.61

TSMDX vs. SWMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the SWMCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMDX and SWMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSMDXSWMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.63

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.45

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.52

-0.12

Drawdowns

TSMDX vs. SWMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMDX drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, roughly equal to the maximum SWMCX drawdown of -40.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMDX and SWMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMDXSWMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.15%

-40.34%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-8.15%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.21%

-21.07%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.54%

-26.09%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.25%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-6.63%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

2.12%

+1.64%

Volatility

TSMDX vs. SWMCX - Volatility Comparison

Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund (TSMDX) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) at 3.28%. This indicates that TSMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMDXSWMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

3.28%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

9.93%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

13.43%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

18.25%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.66%

20.63%

+0.03%

TSMDX vs. SWMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMDX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SWMCX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSMDX vs. SWMCX - Dividend Comparison

TSMDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SWMCX
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund
1.89%2.13%2.60%1.49%1.59%2.93%1.45%2.44%1.41%0.00%0.00%
TSMDX
Trillium ESG Small/Mid Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%6.29%2.47%2.80%2.24%0.12%4.62%5.09%1.72%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSMDX and SWMCX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMDX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to SWMCX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMDX dropped -40.15% vs SWMCX's -40.34%.

SWMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSMDX and SWMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer