PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSM vs. TIGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TSM vs. TIGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) and UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSM achieves a 40.22% return, which is significantly higher than TIGR's -50.10% return.


TSM

1D
0.68%
1M
6.28%
YTD
40.22%
6M
45.91%
1Y
98.93%
3Y*
60.80%
5Y*
31.30%
10Y*
35.80%

TIGR

1D
-0.63%
1M
-28.16%
YTD
-50.10%
6M
-48.38%
1Y
-44.73%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
-30.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSM vs. TIGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
40.22%55.91%92.58%42.33%-36.75%12.09%92.67%53.03%
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Limited
-50.10%47.99%46.15%29.62%-30.55%-38.16%123.66%-56.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TSM and TIGR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TSM:

$2.20T

TIGR:

$848.95M

EPS

TSM:

NT$373.98

TIGR:

$0.62

PE Ratio

TSM:

35.89

TIGR:

7.75

PEG Ratio

TSM:

1.03

TIGR:

0.09

PS Ratio

TSM:

16.87

TIGR:

1.37

PB Ratio

TSM:

11.82

TIGR:

1.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

TSM:

NT$4.13T

TIGR:

$645.56M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TSM:

NT$2.55T

TIGR:

$533.82M

EBITDA (TTM)

TSM:

NT$3.14T

TIGR:

$236.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSM vs. TIGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSM
TSM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSM Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

TIGR
TIGR Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TIGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TIGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSM vs. TIGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) and UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSMTIGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.91

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.48

-0.68

+6.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.42

-1.32

+20.74

TSM vs. TIGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the TIGR Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSM and TIGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSM vs. TIGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSM drawdown since its inception was -89.08%, roughly equal to the maximum TIGR drawdown of -93.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSM and TIGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMTIGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.08%

-93.65%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.14%

-66.44%

+48.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.82%

-66.44%

+29.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.47%

-92.04%

+35.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.87%

-87.01%

+82.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.85%

-77.92%

+35.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.11%

33.97%

-28.86%

Volatility

TSM vs. TIGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is 13.42%, while UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) has a volatility of 35.17%. This indicates that TSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMTIGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.42%

35.17%

-21.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.65%

48.45%

-19.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.69%

67.06%

-30.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.46%

82.74%

-45.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.23%

90.54%

-56.31%

Dividends

TSM vs. TIGR - Dividend Comparison

TSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while TIGR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TIGR
UP Fintech Holding Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
0.83%1.00%1.18%1.78%2.49%1.57%1.56%3.46%3.64%2.32%2.61%2.54%

Financials

TSM vs. TIGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited and UP Fintech Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T1.20T20222023202420252026
1.15T
155.34M
(TSM) Total Revenue
(TIGR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TSM values in TWD, TIGR values in USD

TSM vs. TIGR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited and UP Fintech Holding Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
66.3%
95.0%
Portfolio components
TSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited reported a gross profit of 759.06B and revenue of 1.15T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.3%.

TIGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 147.59M and revenue of 155.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.0%.

TSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited reported an operating income of 664.08B and revenue of 1.15T, resulting in an operating margin of 58.0%.

TIGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported an operating income of 65.89M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.

TSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited reported a net income of 578.40B and revenue of 1.15T, resulting in a net margin of 50.5%.

TIGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a net income of -26.92M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in a net margin of -17.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSM and TIGR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIGR has higher volatility (35.17%) compared to TSM (13.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSM dropped -89.08% vs TIGR's -93.65%.

TSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSM and TIGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer