PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSM vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TSM vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSM achieves a 40.84% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's -0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, TSM has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 35.71%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.46% annualized return.


TSM

1D
2.80%
1M
3.67%
YTD
40.84%
6M
42.15%
1Y
110.53%
3Y*
63.10%
5Y*
31.67%
10Y*
35.71%

NEM

1D
-0.72%
1M
-14.84%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
11.71%
1Y
91.07%
3Y*
36.63%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
13.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSM vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
40.84%55.91%92.58%42.33%-36.75%12.09%92.67%64.85%-3.50%41.46%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
-0.43%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between TSM and NEM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 1997

0.11

The correlation between TSM and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TSM:

$373.98

NEM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

TSM:

1.14

NEM:

15.62

PEG Ratio

TSM:

0.03

NEM:

0.41

PS Ratio

TSM:

0.54

NEM:

4.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

TSM:

$4.13T

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TSM:

$2.55T

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

TSM:

$3.14T

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSM vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSM
TSM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSM Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSM vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSMNEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.32

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.13

3.36

+2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.94

8.94

+13.00

TSM vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSM Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSM and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSMNEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

1.96

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.27

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

0.38

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.12

+0.24

Drawdowns

TSM vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSM drawdown since its inception was -89.08%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSM and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.08%

-81.30%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.14%

-27.25%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.82%

-36.57%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.47%

-62.40%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.47%

-62.40%

+5.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-24.65%

+20.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.87%

-41.38%

-1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.06%

10.22%

-5.16%

Volatility

TSM vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is 12.47%, while Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 14.19%. This indicates that TSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.47%

14.19%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.23%

36.93%

-8.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.40%

46.87%

-10.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.40%

37.83%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.20%

35.59%

-1.39%

Dividends

TSM vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

TSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than NEM's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.03%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
0.78%1.00%1.18%1.78%2.49%1.57%1.56%3.46%3.64%2.32%2.61%2.54%

Financials

TSM vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T1.20T20222023202420252026
1.15T
0
(TSM) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TSM and NEM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEM has higher volatility (14.19%) compared to TSM (12.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSM dropped -89.08% vs NEM's -81.30%.

TSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSM and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer