PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLZ vs. ZIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TSLZ

1D
-3.70%
1M
-18.37%
YTD
-5.60%
6M
-16.90%
1Y
-64.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZIVB

1D
0.00%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLZ vs. ZIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLZ
TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIVB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLZZIVBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.06

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLZZIVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.67

Drawdowns

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and ZIVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLZZIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.11%

0.00%

-99.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.01%

0.00%

-99.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.32%

0.00%

-75.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.42%

Volatility

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLZZIVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.67%

0.00%

+91.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

117.13%

0.00%

+117.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

117.13%

0.00%

+117.13%

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison

TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while ZIVB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.73%0.69%2.08%12.15%
ZIVB
-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.

TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for ZIVB.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLZ and 1.35% for ZIVB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLZ and ZIVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer