PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLZ vs. ZIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
33.84%-75.98%-88.79%-28.07%
ZIVB
-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF
-11.39%-10.71%9.27%27.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a 33.84% return, which is significantly higher than ZIVB's -11.39% return.


TSLZ

1D
-9.26%
1M
13.19%
YTD
33.84%
6M
11.47%
1Y
-80.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZIVB

1D
3.23%
1M
-8.77%
YTD
-11.39%
6M
-7.42%
1Y
-12.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TSLZ vs. ZIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLZ
TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIVB
ZIVB Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ZIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLZZIVBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.74

-0.42

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.20

-0.40

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

0.94

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

-0.56

-0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.03

-1.28

+0.25

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the ZIVB Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLZ and ZIVB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLZZIVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.74

-0.42

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.65

0.32

-0.98

Correlation

The correlation between TSLZ and ZIVB is -0.44. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison

TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than ZIVB's 69.95% yield.


TTM202520242023
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.51%0.69%2.08%12.15%
ZIVB
-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF
69.95%53.44%30.68%0.55%

Drawdowns

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of -37.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and ZIVB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLZZIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.11%

-37.25%

-61.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-90.53%

-22.85%

-67.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.59%

-29.42%

-69.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.67%

-12.80%

-60.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

77.94%

9.96%

+67.98%

Volatility

TSLZ vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a higher volatility of 22.72% compared to -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) at 9.28%. This indicates that TSLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TSLZZIVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.72%

9.28%

+13.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.17%

14.78%

+43.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.01%

29.52%

+80.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

119.13%

29.91%

+89.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

119.13%

29.91%

+89.22%