TSLZ vs. QQQD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD).

TSLZ and QQQD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TSLZ is an actively managed fund by T-Rex. It was launched on Oct 18, 2023. QQQD is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). It was launched on Mar 6, 2024.

Performance

TSLZ vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TSLZ vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	33.84%	-75.98%	-93.56%
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares	14.23%	-20.32%	-27.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a 33.84% return, which is significantly higher than QQQD's 14.23% return.

TSLZ

• 1D: -9.26%
• 1M: 13.19%
• YTD: 33.84%
• 6M: 11.47%
• 1Y: -80.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQD

• 1D: -4.53%
• 1M: 5.87%
• YTD: 14.23%
• 6M: 11.20%
• 1Y: -23.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLZ vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.

TSLZ

T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF

QQQD

Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares

Return for Risk

TSLZ vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLZ

TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

QQQD

QQQD Risk / Return Rank: 3
QQQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
QQQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
QQQD Omega Ratio Rank: 1
QQQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
QQQD Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLZ vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLZ	QQQD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.74	-0.82	+0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.20	-1.02	-0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	0.86	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	-0.54	-0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.03	-0.68	-0.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLZ vs. QQQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is comparable to the QQQD Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLZ and QQQD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLZ	QQQD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.74	-0.82	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.65	-0.68	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between TSLZ and QQQD is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

TSLZ vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison

TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than QQQD's 3.46% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	0.51%	0.69%	2.08%	12.15%
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares	3.46%	4.33%	5.17%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TSLZ vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -47.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and QQQD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLZ	QQQD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.11%	-47.84%	-51.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-90.53%	-42.27%	-48.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.59%	-38.24%	-60.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.67%	-29.01%	-44.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	77.94%	33.41%	+44.53%

Volatility

TSLZ vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a higher volatility of 22.72% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 8.58%. This indicates that TSLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLZ	QQQD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.72%	8.58%	+14.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.17%	15.43%	+42.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	110.01%	28.47%	+81.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	119.13%	27.33%	+91.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	119.13%	27.33%	+91.80%