TSLZ vs. GOOX
TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) and GOOX (T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while GOOX is a Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLZ returned -64.61% vs 269.45% for GOOX. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.
Performance
TSLZ vs. GOOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a -5.60% return, which is significantly lower than GOOX's 20.41% return.
TSLZ
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -5.60%
- 6M
- -16.90%
- 1Y
- -64.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOX
- 1D
- -7.78%
- 1M
- -13.72%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- 269.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ vs. GOOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -5.60% | -75.98% | -90.59% |
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | 20.41% | 121.41% | 46.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLZ and GOOX is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLZ vs. GOOX — Risk / Return Rank
TSLZ
GOOX
TSLZ vs. GOOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLZ | GOOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | 4.73 | -5.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | 4.83 | -5.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.57 | -0.68 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 6.61 | -7.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 22.61 | -23.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLZ | GOOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | 4.73 | -5.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | 1.29 | -1.96 |
Drawdowns
TSLZ vs. GOOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than GOOX's maximum drawdown of -52.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and GOOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLZ | GOOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.11% | -52.46% | -46.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.62% | -38.98% | -37.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.01% | -19.97% | -79.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.32% | -17.03% | -58.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.42% | 11.40% | +49.02% |
Volatility
TSLZ vs. GOOX - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a higher volatility of 24.08% compared to T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF (GOOX) at 16.24%. This indicates that TSLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLZ | GOOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.08% | 16.24% | +7.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.94% | 40.14% | +14.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.67% | 57.51% | +34.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.13% | 60.41% | +56.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.13% | 60.41% | +56.72% |
TSLZ vs. GOOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSLZ and GOOX have an expense ratio of 1.05%.
Dividends
TSLZ vs. GOOX - Dividend Comparison
TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than GOOX's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOX T-Rex 2X Long Alphabet Daily Target ETF | 0.25% | 0.30% | 16.78% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.73% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLZ and GOOX have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLZ has higher volatility (24.08%) compared to GOOX (16.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLZ dropped -99.11% vs GOOX's -52.46%.
On 1-year performance, GOOX leads with 269.45% vs -64.61% for TSLZ. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, GOOX has been the lower-risk option at 16.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOX has performed better with a 269.45% return vs -64.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLZ and GOOX have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.
TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.25% for GOOX.
TSLZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while GOOX is Leveraged Bonds.
GOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.73 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLZ and GOOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer