PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLZ vs. CCUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLZ vs. CCUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a 45.39% return, which is significantly higher than CCUP's -68.20% return.


TSLZ

1D
-1.43%
1M
44.35%
6M
37.89%
YTD
45.39%
1Y
-48.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-71.84%

CCUP

1D
-5.80%
1M
-12.38%
6M
-48.89%
YTD
-68.20%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.28M$10.66M$16.94M
$39.89M$35.72M$42.79M

TSLZ vs. CCUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSLZ and CCUP is -0.31, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025

-0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLZ vs. CCUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSLZ
TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

CCUP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSLZ vs. CCUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLZCCUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.82

TSLZ vs. CCUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLZ vs. CCUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, roughly equal to the maximum CCUP drawdown of -94.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and CCUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLZCCUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.11%

-94.91%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.47%

-94.76%

-3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.60%

-72.72%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.63%

Volatility

TSLZ vs. CCUP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLZCCUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.79%

193.37%

-101.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

117.68%

193.37%

-75.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

117.68%

193.37%

-75.69%

TSLZ vs. CCUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CCUP's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLZ vs. CCUP - Dividend Comparison

TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while CCUP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CCUP
T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.47%0.69%2.08%12.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLZ and CCUP have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CCUP.

TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for CCUP.

TSLZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CCUP is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLZ and 1.50% for CCUP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLZ and CCUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer