TSLY vs. JANP

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP).

TSLY and JANP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TSLY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Nov 22, 2022. JANP is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 29, 2023.

Performance

TSLY vs. JANP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TSLY vs. JANP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	-12.77%	13.62%	27.29%
JANP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January	-1.69%	13.33%	15.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLY achieves a -12.77% return, which is significantly lower than JANP's -1.69% return.

TSLY

• 1D: -4.10%
• 1M: -5.15%
• YTD: -12.77%
• 6M: -8.19%
• 1Y: 36.38%
• 3Y*: 12.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JANP

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: -1.69%
• 6M: 1.38%
• 1Y: 13.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLY vs. JANP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than JANP's 0.50% expense ratio.

TSLY

YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF

JANP

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January

Return for Risk

TSLY vs. JANP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLY

TSLY Risk / Return Rank: 48
TSLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
TSLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
TSLY Omega Ratio Rank: 40
TSLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
TSLY Martin Ratio Rank: 45

JANP

JANP Risk / Return Rank: 64
JANP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
JANP Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
JANP Omega Ratio Rank: 74
JANP Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
JANP Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLY vs. JANP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLY	JANP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	1.14	-0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	1.71	-0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.29	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	1.68	+0.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.04	8.95	-3.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLY vs. JANP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the JANP Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLY and JANP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLY	JANP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	1.14	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	1.31	-1.08

Correlation

The correlation between TSLY and JANP is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TSLY vs. JANP - Dividend Comparison

TSLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.85%, while JANP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	101.85%	91.19%	82.30%	76.47%
JANP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TSLY vs. JANP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLY drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, which is greater than JANP's maximum drawdown of -12.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLY and JANP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLY	JANP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.52%	-12.18%	-37.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.82%	-5.44%	-14.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.44%	-2.89%	-15.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.39%	-0.94%	-19.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.37%	1.54%	+6.83%

Volatility

TSLY vs. JANP - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) at 3.45%. This indicates that TSLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JANP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLY	JANP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.12%	3.45%	+6.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.88%	5.45%	+19.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.37%	11.57%	+32.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.08%	9.23%	+36.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.08%	9.23%	+36.85%