JANP vs. OCTQ
JANP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January) and OCTQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. JANP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for OCTQ.
Performance
JANP vs. OCTQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JANP
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 6.30%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 18.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANP vs. OCTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JANP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January | 5.28% |
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JANP vs. OCTQ — Risk / Return Rank
JANP
OCTQ
JANP vs. OCTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JANP | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.74 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.93 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JANP | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.64 | — | — |
Drawdowns
JANP vs. OCTQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANP drawdown since its inception was -12.18%, which is greater than OCTQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANP and OCTQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANP | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.18% | 0.00% | -12.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | 0.00% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | — | — |
Volatility
JANP vs. OCTQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JANP | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.77% | 0.00% | +6.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.07% | 0.00% | +9.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.07% | 0.00% | +9.07% |
JANP vs. OCTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than OCTQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
JANP vs. OCTQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither JANP nor OCTQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, JANP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JANP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OCTQ.
JANP and OCTQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for JANP and 0.79% for OCTQ.
Find the right allocation for JANP and OCTQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer