TSLY vs. FEBP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and FEBP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLY returned 27.37% vs 18.66% for FEBP. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FEBP.

Performance

TSLY vs. FEBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLY achieves a -2.70% return, which is significantly lower than FEBP's 7.00% return.

TSLY

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 4.95%
• YTD: -2.70%
• 6M: -3.20%
• 1Y: 27.37%
• 3Y*: 14.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FEBP

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 2.26%
• YTD: 7.00%
• 6M: 7.97%
• 1Y: 18.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLY vs. FEBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	-2.70%	13.62%	61.24%
FEBP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February	7.00%	12.06%	12.73%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLY and FEBP is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	0.54

The correlation between TSLY and FEBP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSLY vs. FEBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLY

TSLY Risk / Return Rank: 24
TSLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
TSLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
TSLY Omega Ratio Rank: 23
TSLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
TSLY Martin Ratio Rank: 24

FEBP

FEBP Risk / Return Rank: 83
FEBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FEBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FEBP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FEBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FEBP Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLY vs. FEBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLY	FEBP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	2.69	-1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	3.87	-2.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.54	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	3.43	-2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.10	17.70	-14.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLY vs. FEBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the FEBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLY and FEBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLY	FEBP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	2.69	-1.97
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	1.54	-1.25

Drawdowns

TSLY vs. FEBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLY drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, which is greater than FEBP's maximum drawdown of -12.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLY and FEBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLY	FEBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.52%	-12.11%	-37.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.64%	-5.47%	-16.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.03%	-0.06%	-8.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.99%	-0.91%	-19.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.95%	1.06%	+7.89%

Volatility

TSLY vs. FEBP - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a higher volatility of 10.02% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February (FEBP) at 1.39%. This indicates that TSLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLY	FEBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.02%	1.39%	+8.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.40%	5.44%	+16.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.20%	6.96%	+31.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.48%	8.98%	+36.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.48%	8.98%	+36.50%

TSLY vs. FEBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FEBP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLY vs. FEBP - Dividend Comparison

TSLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 86.88%, while FEBP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FEBP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	86.88%	91.19%	82.30%	76.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLY and FEBP in my portfolio?

TSLY and FEBP have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLY or FEBP?

TSLY has higher volatility (10.02%) compared to FEBP (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLY dropped -49.52% vs FEBP's -12.11%.

Which ETF is better, TSLY or FEBP?

On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 27.37% vs 18.66% for FEBP. On fees, FEBP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FEBP has been the lower-risk option at 1.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLY or FEBP?

Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 27.37% return vs 18.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLY or FEBP?

FEBP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLY or FEBP?

TSLY has the higher dividend yield at 86.88%, compared with 0.00% for FEBP.

What is the main difference between TSLY and FEBP?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLY and 0.50% for FEBP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.