TSLY vs. CONY
TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while CONY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLY returned 16.20% vs -54.88% for CONY. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CONY.
Performance
TSLY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLY achieves a -10.36% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -30.21% return.
TSLY
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -9.35%
- YTD
- -10.36%
- 6M
- -16.04%
- 1Y
- 16.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONY
- 1D
- -4.67%
- 1M
- -15.89%
- YTD
- -30.21%
- 6M
- -33.56%
- 1Y
- -54.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -10.36% | 13.62% | 27.83% | -3.25% |
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -30.21% | -26.34% | 23.62% | 76.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLY and CONY is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank
TSLY
CONY
TSLY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.83 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | -0.87 | +1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.79 | -1.37 | +3.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLY drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLY and CONY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.52% | -63.57% | +14.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.64% | -63.39% | +41.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.18% | -60.46% | +44.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.86% | -22.89% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.19% | 40.07% | -30.88% |
Volatility
TSLY vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) is 12.18%, while YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a volatility of 15.90%. This indicates that TSLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.18% | 15.90% | -3.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.76% | 44.57% | -20.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.67% | 57.96% | -22.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.50% | 59.92% | -14.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.50% | 59.92% | -14.42% |
TSLY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CONY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison
TSLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 90.66%, less than CONY's 215.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 215.02% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 90.66% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLY and CONY have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONY has higher volatility (15.90%) compared to TSLY (12.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLY dropped -49.52% vs CONY's -63.57%.
On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 16.20% vs -54.88% for CONY. On fees, CONY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSLY has been the lower-risk option at 12.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 16.20% return vs -54.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CONY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLY.
CONY has the higher dividend yield at 215.02%, compared with 90.66% for TSLY.
TSLY is categorized as Options Trading, while CONY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLY and 0.99% for CONY.
TSLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLY and CONY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer