PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLW vs. TSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLW vs. TSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TSLW having a -35.82% return and TSL slightly lower at -36.78%.


TSLW

1D
-2.26%
1M
-28.07%
6M
-26.97%
YTD
-35.82%
1Y
-2.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-11.33%

TSL

1D
-2.22%
1M
-28.90%
6M
-27.74%
YTD
-36.78%
1Y
-1.73%
3Y*
-0.03%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.25M$7.43M$12.09M
$2.02M$1.65M$2.51M

TSLW vs. TSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSLW
Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF
-35.82%35.28%
TSL
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF
-36.78%32.16%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLW and TSL is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025

1.00

The correlation between TSLW and TSL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLW vs. TSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSLW
TSLW Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TSLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLW Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLW Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

TSL
TSL Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSL Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSLW vs. TSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLWTSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.04

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

-0.04

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.10

-0.09

-0.02

TSLW vs. TSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLW Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is comparable to the TSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLW and TSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLW vs. TSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLW drawdown since its inception was -47.19%, smaller than the maximum TSL drawdown of -74.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLW and TSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLWTSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.19%

-74.52%

+27.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.19%

-48.38%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.16%

-47.60%

+5.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.19%

-38.53%

+23.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.54%

20.18%

-0.64%

Volatility

TSLW vs. TSL - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) have volatilities of 22.43% and 23.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLWTSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.43%

23.49%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.76%

43.52%

-1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.51%

57.82%

-2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.72%

73.38%

-14.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.72%

73.38%

-14.66%

TSLW vs. TSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TSL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLW vs. TSL - Dividend Comparison

TSLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 115.60%, while TSL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
TSL
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%60.47%
TSLW
Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF
115.60%49.31%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, TSLW and TSL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSL has higher volatility (23.49%) compared to TSLW (22.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLW dropped -47.19% vs TSL's -74.52%.

On 1-year performance, TSL leads with -1.73% vs -2.05% for TSLW. On fees, TSLW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSLW has been the lower-risk option at 22.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSL has performed better with a -1.73% return vs -2.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSL.

TSLW has the higher dividend yield at 115.60%, compared with 0.00% for TSL.

TSLW is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLW and 1.15% for TSL.

TSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLW and TSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer