TSLW vs. NVYY
TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) and NVYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while NVYY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLW returned 20.22% vs 31.22% for NVYY. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for NVYY.
Performance
TSLW vs. NVYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLW achieves a -9.26% return, which is significantly lower than NVYY's 4.60% return.
TSLW
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 9.09%
- YTD
- -9.26%
- 6M
- -9.14%
- 1Y
- 20.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVYY
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 6M
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLW vs. NVYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | -9.26% | 33.77% |
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 4.60% | 26.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLW and NVYY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLW vs. NVYY — Risk / Return Rank
TSLW
NVYY
TSLW vs. NVYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLW | NVYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 2.10 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 4.82 | -3.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLW | NVYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 1.29 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 1.48 | -1.09 |
Drawdowns
TSLW vs. NVYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLW drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, which is greater than NVYY's maximum drawdown of -14.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLW and NVYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLW | NVYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.80% | -14.90% | -20.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.80% | -14.90% | -20.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.23% | -4.86% | -13.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.88% | -5.00% | -7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.77% | 6.50% | +9.27% |
Volatility
TSLW vs. NVYY - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) has a higher volatility of 14.56% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) at 4.65%. This indicates that TSLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLW | NVYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.56% | 4.65% | +9.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.83% | 16.78% | +16.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.52% | 24.28% | +31.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.52% | 24.10% | +31.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.52% | 24.10% | +31.42% |
TSLW vs. NVYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NVYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLW vs. NVYY - Dividend Comparison
TSLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.61%, less than NVYY's 147.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 147.62% | 75.30% |
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | 84.61% | 49.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLW and NVYY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLW has higher volatility (14.56%) compared to NVYY (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLW dropped -35.80% vs NVYY's -14.90%.
On 1-year performance, NVYY leads with 31.22% vs 20.22% for TSLW. On fees, TSLW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NVYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVYY has performed better with a 31.22% return vs 20.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NVYY.
NVYY has the higher dividend yield at 147.62%, compared with 84.61% for TSLW.
TSLW is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVYY is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLW and 1.07% for NVYY.
NVYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLW and NVYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer