TSLW vs. CHAT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLW returned 18.45% vs 73.94% for CHAT. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.

Performance

TSLW vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLW achieves a -18.26% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 42.01% return.

TSLW

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: -4.59%
• 6M: -15.42%
• YTD: -18.26%
• 1Y: 18.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHAT

• 1D: -5.30%
• 1M: -12.49%
• 6M: 36.21%
• YTD: 42.01%
• 1Y: 73.94%
• 3Y*: 41.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLW vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF	-18.26%	35.28%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	42.01%	45.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLW and CHAT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025	0.48

The correlation between TSLW and CHAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSLW vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLW

TSLW Risk / Return Rank: 17
TSLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
TSLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
TSLW Omega Ratio Rank: 18
TSLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
TSLW Martin Ratio Rank: 15

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 74
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLW vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSLW	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	2.00	-1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	2.39	-1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.32	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	3.80	-3.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.08	11.13	-10.05

TSLW vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLW Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLW and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSLW vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLW drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLW and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLW	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.80%	-31.34%	-4.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.80%	-19.54%	-16.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.34%	-19.54%	-6.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.98%	-5.52%	-8.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.15%	6.67%	+10.48%

Volatility

TSLW vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) has a higher volatility of 19.92% compared to Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) at 16.90%. This indicates that TSLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLW	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.92%	16.90%	+3.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.31%	32.39%	+4.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.47%	37.11%	+16.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.97%	31.83%	+25.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.97%	31.83%	+25.14%

TSLW vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLW vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

TSLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 92.33%, more than CHAT's 2.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	2.01%	2.85%
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF	92.33%	49.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLW and CHAT in my portfolio?

TSLW and CHAT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLW or CHAT?

TSLW has higher volatility (19.92%) compared to CHAT (16.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLW dropped -35.80% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

Which ETF is better, TSLW or CHAT?

On 1-year performance, CHAT leads with 73.94% vs 18.45% for TSLW. On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CHAT has been the lower-risk option at 16.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLW or CHAT?

Over the 1-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 73.94% return vs 18.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLW or CHAT?

CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSLW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLW or CHAT?

TSLW has the higher dividend yield at 92.33%, compared with 2.01% for CHAT.

What is the main difference between TSLW and CHAT?

TSLW is categorized as Derivative Income, while CHAT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLW and 0.75% for CHAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.