PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLS vs. QQQE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLS vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 33.30% return, which is significantly higher than QQQE's 14.79% return.


TSLS

1D
-0.74%
1M
22.65%
6M
27.99%
YTD
33.30%
1Y
-14.97%
3Y*
-27.51%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-25.22%

QQQE

1D
0.29%
1M
-2.56%
6M
13.07%
YTD
14.79%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
14.70%
ALL TIME*
14.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.33M$22.31M$23.91M
$28.97M$27.46M$30.88M

TSLS vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF
33.30%-34.95%-55.71%-60.12%105.60%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
14.79%14.58%6.98%33.76%-10.30%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLS and QQQE is -0.57, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022

-0.56

The correlation between TSLS and QQQE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.57 to -0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLS vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSLS
TSLS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TSLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSLS vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLSQQQEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.22

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

2.11

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.45

6.75

-7.20

TSLS vs. QQQE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLS Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the QQQE Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLS and QQQE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLS vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and QQQE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLSQQQEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.73%

-32.14%

-58.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.36%

-9.41%

-31.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.16%

-21.38%

-62.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.56%

-4.46%

-82.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.44%

-5.14%

-59.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.53%

2.94%

+26.59%

Volatility

TSLS vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS) has a higher volatility of 19.07% compared to Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) at 3.68%. This indicates that TSLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLSQQQEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.07%

3.68%

+15.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.98%

12.96%

+21.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.81%

16.02%

+30.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.98%

20.58%

+38.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.98%

20.76%

+38.22%

TSLS vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLS vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison

TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than QQQE's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.58%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF
2.36%4.30%7.62%4.52%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLS and QQQE have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLS has higher volatility (19.07%) compared to QQQE (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs QQQE's -32.14%.

On 3-year performance, QQQE leads with 14.21% vs -27.51% for TSLS. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QQQE has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QQQE has performed better with a 14.21% return vs -27.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TSLS.

TSLS has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.58% for QQQE.

TSLS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. TSLS tracks Tesla, Inc. (-100% Daily), while QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TSLS and 0.35% for QQQE.

QQQE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLS and QQQE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer