TSLS vs. QQQD
TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares) and QQQD (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion - TSLS tracks the Tesla Inc (--100%) while QQQD tracks the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TSLS returned -18.80% vs -14.61% for QQQD. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLS charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QQQD.
Performance
TSLS vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly higher than QQQD's 4.24% return.
TSLS
- 1D
- 5.18%
- 1M
- 9.46%
- YTD
- 12.45%
- 6M
- 21.31%
- 1Y
- -18.80%
- 3Y*
- -32.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQD
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 4.24%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- -14.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLS vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 12.45% | -34.95% | -67.64% |
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 4.24% | -20.32% | -27.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLS and QQQD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between TSLS and QQQD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLS vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank
TSLS
QQQD
TSLS vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLS | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.90 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.64 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | -1.01 | +0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLS vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and QQQD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLS | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.73% | -49.47% | -41.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.46% | -22.92% | -20.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.66% | -43.64% | -45.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.77% | -30.63% | -33.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.42% | 14.98% | +15.44% |
Volatility
TSLS vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) has a higher volatility of 13.77% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 7.17%. This indicates that TSLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLS | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.77% | 7.17% | +6.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.37% | 15.65% | +12.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.91% | 20.89% | +24.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.68% | 26.85% | +31.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.68% | 26.85% | +31.83% |
TSLS vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLS vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison
TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than QQQD's 3.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 3.79% | 4.33% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.11% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLS and QQQD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLS has higher volatility (13.77%) compared to QQQD (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs QQQD's -49.47%.
On 1-year performance, QQQD leads with -14.61% vs -18.80% for TSLS. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 7.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQD has performed better with a -14.61% return vs -18.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLS.
QQQD has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 3.11% for TSLS.
TSLS tracks Tesla Inc (--100%), while QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLS and 0.57% for QQQD.
TSLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLS and QQQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer