TSLS vs. QQQD
TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares) and QQQD (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion - TSLS tracks the Tesla Inc (--100%) while QQQD tracks the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TSLS returned -29.14% vs -23.09% for QQQD. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLS charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QQQD.
Performance
TSLS vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than QQQD's -4.21% return.
TSLS
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -8.56%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- -2.42%
- 1Y
- -29.14%
- 3Y*
- -38.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQD
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -3.13%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -3.61%
- 1Y
- -23.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLS vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.03% | -34.95% | -67.28% |
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | -4.21% | -20.32% | -27.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLS and QQQD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.74 |
The correlation between TSLS and QQQD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLS vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank
TSLS
QQQD
TSLS vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLS | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | -1.15 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | -1.66 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.82 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.89 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | -1.34 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLS | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | -1.15 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -0.88 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
TSLS vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and QQQD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLS | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.73% | -49.47% | -41.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.42% | -26.65% | -19.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.61% | -48.21% | -41.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.47% | -30.31% | -33.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.75% | 17.65% | +15.10% |
Volatility
TSLS vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) has a higher volatility of 12.05% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 4.51%. This indicates that TSLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLS | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.05% | 4.51% | +7.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.72% | 14.36% | +13.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.68% | 20.16% | +26.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 26.78% | +32.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 26.78% | +32.01% |
TSLS vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLS vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison
TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than QQQD's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 4.12% | 4.33% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.39% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLS and QQQD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to QQQD (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs QQQD's -49.47%.
On 1-year performance, QQQD leads with -23.09% vs -29.14% for TSLS. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQD has performed better with a -23.09% return vs -29.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLS.
QQQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 3.39% for TSLS.
TSLS tracks Tesla Inc (--100%), while QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLS and 0.57% for QQQD.
TSLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLS and QQQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer