TSLQ vs. QQQD
TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) and QQQD (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. TSLQ is actively managed, while QQQD is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLQ returned -49.38% vs -14.61% for QQQD. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLQ charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QQQD.
Performance
TSLQ vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly higher than QQQD's 4.24% return.
TSLQ
- 1D
- 11.57%
- 1M
- 18.36%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 31.99%
- 1Y
- -49.38%
- 3Y*
- -64.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQD
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 4.24%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- -14.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLQ vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 13.60% | -74.67% | -87.77% |
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 4.24% | -20.32% | -27.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLQ and QQQD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.74 |
The correlation between TSLQ and QQQD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLQ vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank
TSLQ
QQQD
TSLQ vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLQ | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.90 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.64 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | -1.01 | +0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLQ vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and QQQD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLQ | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.73% | -49.47% | -49.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.21% | -22.92% | -49.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.31% | -43.64% | -54.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.61% | -30.63% | -36.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.23% | 14.98% | +41.25% |
Volatility
TSLQ vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a higher volatility of 27.76% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 7.17%. This indicates that TSLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLQ | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.76% | 7.17% | +20.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.68% | 15.65% | +41.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.33% | 20.89% | +68.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.31% | 26.85% | +67.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.31% | 26.85% | +67.46% |
TSLQ vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLQ has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLQ vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison
TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than QQQD's 3.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 3.79% | 4.33% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 9.30% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLQ and QQQD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLQ has higher volatility (27.76%) compared to QQQD (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs QQQD's -49.47%.
On 1-year performance, QQQD leads with -14.61% vs -49.38% for TSLQ. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 7.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQD has performed better with a -14.61% return vs -49.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for TSLQ.
TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.30%, compared with 3.79% for QQQD.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for TSLQ and 0.57% for QQQD.
TSLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLQ and QQQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer