TSLQ vs. NVDS
TSLQ (AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF) and NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds from AXS. TSLQ is actively managed, while NVDS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLQ returned -68.13%/yr vs -65.20%/yr for NVDS. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.15% expense ratio.
Performance
TSLQ vs. NVDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a -3.80% return, which is significantly higher than NVDS's -29.31% return.
TSLQ
- 1D
- -3.75%
- 1M
- -18.02%
- YTD
- -3.80%
- 6M
- -15.12%
- 1Y
- -62.78%
- 3Y*
- -68.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDS
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -17.63%
- YTD
- -29.31%
- 6M
- -32.74%
- 1Y
- -58.02%
- 3Y*
- -65.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLQ vs. NVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | -3.80% | -74.67% | -83.21% | -59.97% | 63.52% |
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | -29.31% | -58.18% | -80.03% | -83.15% | -14.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLQ and NVDS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLQ vs. NVDS — Risk / Return Rank
TSLQ
NVDS
TSLQ vs. NVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLQ | NVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | -1.14 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | -1.91 | +1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.79 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -0.97 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | -1.53 | +0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLQ | NVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | -1.14 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.65 | -1.03 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
TSLQ vs. NVDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDS drawdown of -99.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and NVDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLQ | NVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.73% | -99.40% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.93% | -59.88% | -16.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.85% | -96.32% | -1.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.57% | -99.35% | +0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.15% | -83.38% | +16.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.46% | 38.60% | +20.86% |
Volatility
TSLQ vs. NVDS - Volatility Comparison
AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a higher volatility of 24.08% compared to Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) at 18.32%. This indicates that TSLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLQ | NVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.08% | 18.32% | +5.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.84% | 38.28% | +16.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.72% | 50.88% | +41.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.16% | 68.85% | +25.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.16% | 68.85% | +25.31% |
TSLQ vs. NVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSLQ and NVDS have an expense ratio of 1.15%.
Dividends
TSLQ vs. NVDS - Dividend Comparison
TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.98%, less than NVDS's 20.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | 20.07% | 14.19% | 14.11% | 14.69% | 5.72% |
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | 10.98% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLQ and NVDS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLQ has higher volatility (24.08%) compared to NVDS (18.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs NVDS's -99.40%.
On 3-year performance, NVDS leads with -65.20% vs -68.13% for TSLQ. Both ETFs have the same 1.15% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDS has been the lower-risk option at 18.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NVDS has performed better with a -65.20% return vs -68.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLQ and NVDS have the same expense ratio: 1.15% per year.
NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 20.07%, compared with 10.98% for TSLQ.
TSLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLQ and NVDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer