TSLP vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLP returned 15.63% vs 5.69% for LQTI. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

TSLP vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLP achieves a -8.72% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.16% return.

TSLP

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 7.73%
• YTD: -8.72%
• 6M: -8.30%
• 1Y: 15.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLP vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF	-8.72%	19.24%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.16%	6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLP and LQTI is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.11

Return for Risk

TSLP vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLP

TSLP Risk / Return Rank: 15
TSLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
TSLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
TSLP Omega Ratio Rank: 16
TSLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
TSLP Martin Ratio Rank: 14

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 32
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLP vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLP	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	1.12	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	1.64	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.19	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	1.68	-1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.20	5.15	-3.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLP vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLP and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLP	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	1.12	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.88	-0.43

Drawdowns

TSLP vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLP drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLP and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLP	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.00%	-3.41%	-42.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.00%	-3.41%	-28.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.68%	-1.44%	-14.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.73%	-0.88%	-14.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.16%	1.11%	+12.05%

Volatility

TSLP vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) has a higher volatility of 12.75% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.65%. This indicates that TSLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLP	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.75%	1.65%	+11.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.48%	4.02%	+24.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.87%	5.10%	+37.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.60%	5.97%	+42.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.60%	5.97%	+42.63%

TSLP vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLP vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

TSLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.32%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.11%	7.01%	0.00%	0.00%
TSLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF	30.32%	31.05%	21.82%	4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLP and LQTI in my portfolio?

TSLP and LQTI have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLP or LQTI?

TSLP has higher volatility (12.75%) compared to LQTI (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLP dropped -46.00% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, TSLP or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, TSLP leads with 15.63% vs 5.69% for LQTI. On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLP or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, TSLP has performed better with a 15.63% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLP or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSLP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLP or LQTI?

TSLP has the higher dividend yield at 30.32%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between TSLP and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: Kurv and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLP and 0.65% for LQTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.