PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLP vs. GPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLP vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLP achieves a -8.72% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 9.91% return.


TSLP

1D
0.04%
1M
7.73%
YTD
-8.72%
6M
-8.30%
1Y
15.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GPIX

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.27%
YTD
9.91%
6M
10.34%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLP vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TSLP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF
-8.72%9.77%41.53%18.42%
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
9.91%16.25%21.77%14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLP and GPIX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2023

0.53

The correlation between TSLP and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLP vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLP
TSLP Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TSLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLP vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLPGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.48

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

3.33

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.20

16.77

-15.57

TSLP vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLP and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLPGPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

2.52

-2.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

1.78

-1.33

Drawdowns

TSLP vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLP drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLP and GPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLPGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.00%

-17.50%

-28.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.00%

-7.71%

-24.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.68%

-0.48%

-15.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.73%

-1.48%

-14.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.16%

1.53%

+11.63%

Volatility

TSLP vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) has a higher volatility of 12.75% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 2.26%. This indicates that TSLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLPGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.75%

2.26%

+10.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.48%

7.89%

+20.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.87%

10.17%

+32.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.60%

13.80%

+34.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.60%

13.80%

+34.80%

TSLP vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLP vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

TSLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.32%, more than GPIX's 8.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.00%8.01%7.45%1.40%
TSLP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF
30.32%31.05%21.82%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLP and GPIX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLP has higher volatility (12.75%) compared to GPIX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLP dropped -46.00% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 25.55% vs 15.63% for TSLP. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 25.55% return vs 15.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSLP.

TSLP has the higher dividend yield at 30.32%, compared with 8.00% for GPIX.

They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLP and 0.29% for GPIX.

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLP and GPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer