TSLI.L vs. CSH2.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSLI.L (IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP) and CSH2.L (Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while CSH2.L is a Money Market fund actively managed by Amundi. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLI.L returned 45.38% vs 3.68% for CSH2.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSH2.L.

Performance

TSLI.L vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

TSLI.L is traded in USD, while CSH2.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSH2.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLI.L achieves a -6.35% return, which is significantly lower than CSH2.L's 1.47% return.

TSLI.L

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 5.02%
• YTD: -6.35%
• 6M: -3.38%
• 1Y: 45.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSH2.L

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 2.64%
• 1Y: 3.68%
• 3Y*: 7.67%
• 5Y*: 2.57%
• 10Y*: 1.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLI.L vs. CSH2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP	-6.35%	40.52%	28.35%
CSH2.L Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP	1.47%	12.57%	-0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLI.L and CSH2.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024	0.09

Return for Risk

TSLI.L vs. CSH2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLI.L

TSLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
TSLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
TSLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
TSLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
TSLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CSH2.L

CSH2.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLI.L vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLI.L	CSH2.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	0.55	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	0.85	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.10	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	0.89	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.60	1.95	+2.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLI.L vs. CSH2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLI.L and CSH2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLI.L	CSH2.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	0.55	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.07	+0.71

Drawdowns

TSLI.L vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLI.L drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, which is greater than CSH2.L's maximum drawdown of -29.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLI.L and CSH2.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLI.L	CSH2.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.20%	-29.83%	-11.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.94%	-4.11%	-20.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.81%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.98%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.21%	-1.65%	-10.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.02%	-12.73%	+0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.79%	1.88%	+7.91%

Volatility

TSLI.L vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) has a higher volatility of 11.68% compared to Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) at 1.82%. This indicates that TSLI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLI.L	CSH2.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.68%	1.82%	+9.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.22%	4.94%	+20.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.65%	6.63%	+31.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.15%	8.55%	+34.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.15%	9.36%	+33.79%

TSLI.L vs. CSH2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH2.L's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLI.L vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison

TSLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.61%, while CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CSH2.L Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP	71.61%	73.68%	19.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLI.L and CSH2.L in my portfolio?

TSLI.L and CSH2.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSLI.L or CSH2.L?

On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLI.L or CSH2.L?

CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSLI.L.

What is the main difference between TSLI.L and CSH2.L?

TSLI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while CSH2.L is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSLI.L and 0.07% for CSH2.L.