TSLI.L vs. AOD

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

TSLI.L (IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while AOD (Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund) is a stock. Over the past year, TSLI.L returned 3.30% vs 33.31% for AOD. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for AOD.

Performance

TSLI.L vs. AOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) and Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLI.L achieves a -24.15% return, which is significantly lower than AOD's 12.61% return.

TSLI.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -9.66%
• YTD: -24.15%
• 6M: -26.27%
• 1Y: 3.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AOD

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 33.31%
• 3Y*: 20.75%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: 13.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLI.L vs. AOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP	-24.15%	15.61%	25.40%
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund	12.61%	32.14%	3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLI.L and AOD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2024	0.34

Return for Risk

TSLI.L vs. AOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLI.L

TSLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 10
TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
TSLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
TSLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 10
TSLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
TSLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 10

AOD

AOD Risk / Return Rank: 87
AOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AOD Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
AOD Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLI.L vs. AOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) and Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSLI.L	AOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	2.10	-2.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	2.84	-2.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.39	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	2.00	-1.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	8.59	-8.38

TSLI.L vs. AOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the AOD Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLI.L and AOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSLI.L vs. AOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLI.L drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, smaller than the maximum AOD drawdown of -72.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLI.L and AOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLI.L	AOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.20%	-72.26%	+31.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.69%	-16.71%	-16.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.92%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.89%	-1.78%	-27.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.69%	-27.20%	+12.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.01%	3.89%	+12.12%

Volatility

TSLI.L vs. AOD - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) has a higher volatility of 10.79% compared to Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) at 5.22%. This indicates that TSLI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLI.L	AOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.79%	5.22%	+5.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.09%	13.70%	+13.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.06%	15.99%	+22.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.05%	16.77%	+27.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.05%	18.52%	+25.53%

TSLI.L vs. AOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than AOD's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLI.L vs. AOD - Dividend Comparison

TSLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.17%, more than AOD's 11.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund	11.81%	12.00%	10.73%	8.56%	8.85%	6.75%	7.80%	7.71%	9.57%	7.29%	9.10%	8.93%
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP	35.17%	55.94%	5.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLI.L and AOD in my portfolio?

TSLI.L and AOD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.