PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLG vs. LABD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TSLG vs. LABD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TSLG vs. LABD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-32.40%-26.70%-16.81%
LABD
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares
-23.87%-70.07%10.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLG achieves a -32.40% return, which is significantly lower than LABD's -23.87% return.


TSLG

1D
5.35%
1M
-12.62%
YTD
-32.40%
6M
-40.60%
1Y
32.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LABD

1D
-2.09%
1M
-11.32%
YTD
-23.87%
6M
-58.51%
1Y
-84.35%
3Y*
-55.80%
5Y*
-38.87%
10Y*
-57.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TSLG vs. LABD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LABD's 1.06% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TSLG vs. LABD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

LABD
LABD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
LABD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
LABD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLG vs. LABD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLGLABDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.30

-0.99

+1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.23

-2.24

+3.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.75

+0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

-0.94

+1.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.76

-1.20

+2.96

TSLG vs. LABD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the LABD Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLG and LABD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLGLABDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

-0.99

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

-0.54

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between TSLG and LABD is -0.36. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

TSLG vs. LABD - Dividend Comparison

TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%, more than LABD's 5.94% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
9.69%6.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LABD
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares
5.94%6.67%4.68%6.13%0.53%0.00%3.94%1.75%0.81%

Drawdowns

TSLG vs. LABD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLG drawdown since its inception was -82.86%, smaller than the maximum LABD drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLG and LABD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLGLABDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.86%

-99.99%

+17.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.92%

-88.34%

+37.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.85%

-99.99%

+34.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.06%

-90.78%

+32.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.98%

68.69%

-44.71%

Volatility

TSLG vs. LABD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) is 22.51%, while Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3x Shares (LABD) has a volatility of 36.09%. This indicates that TSLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LABD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TSLGLABDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.51%

36.09%

-13.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.61%

59.04%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.65%

86.25%

+24.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

118.91%

96.40%

+22.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

118.91%

96.38%

+22.53%