TSLD.L vs. COII.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP (TSLD.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L).

TSLD.L and COII.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TSLD.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jul 18, 2024. COII.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Sep 26, 2024.

Performance

TSLD.L vs. COII.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP (TSLD.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TSLD.L vs. COII.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSLD.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP	-20.30%	23.54%	19.03%
COII.L IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP	-44.45%	-47.27%	15.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLD.L achieves a -20.30% return, which is significantly higher than COII.L's -44.45% return.

TSLD.L

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -4.94%
• YTD: -20.30%
• 6M: -12.91%
• 1Y: 37.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COII.L

• 1D: -1.98%
• 1M: -10.24%
• YTD: -44.45%
• 6M: -65.47%
• 1Y: -61.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLD.L vs. COII.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TSLD.L and COII.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.

TSLD.L

IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP

COII.L

IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP

Return for Risk

TSLD.L vs. COII.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLD.L

TSLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 46
TSLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
TSLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
TSLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
TSLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
TSLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 36

COII.L

COII.L Risk / Return Rank: 1
COII.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
COII.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
COII.L Omega Ratio Rank: 0
COII.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
COII.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLD.L vs. COII.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP (TSLD.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLD.L	COII.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	-1.04	+1.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	-1.68	+3.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.79	+0.39
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	-0.84	+2.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.63	-1.58	+5.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLD.L vs. COII.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the COII.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLD.L and COII.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLD.L	COII.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	-1.04	+1.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	-0.86	+1.08

Correlation

The correlation between TSLD.L and COII.L is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TSLD.L vs. COII.L - Dividend Comparison

TSLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.86%, less than COII.L's 131.92% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
TSLD.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP	53.86%	70.00%	16.24%
COII.L IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP	131.92%	191.72%	18.99%

Drawdowns

TSLD.L vs. COII.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLD.L drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, smaller than the maximum COII.L drawdown of -76.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLD.L and COII.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLD.L	COII.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.95%	-76.00%	+32.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.89%	-74.77%	+48.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.27%	-74.97%	+49.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.81%	-29.96%	+15.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.20%	39.77%	-29.57%

Volatility

TSLD.L vs. COII.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP (TSLD.L) is 8.05%, while IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) has a volatility of 17.53%. This indicates that TSLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COII.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLD.L	COII.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.05%	17.53%	-9.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.02%	45.45%	-21.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.26%	59.07%	-18.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.08%	59.41%	-16.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.08%	59.41%	-16.33%