TSLA vs. CMFP.L
TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) is a stock, while CMFP.L (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Over the past 10 years, TSLA returned 39.85%/yr vs 7.84%/yr for CMFP.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSLA vs. CMFP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TSLA is traded in USD, while CMFP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMFP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLA achieves a -8.58% return, which is significantly lower than CMFP.L's 13.99% return. Over the past 10 years, TSLA has outperformed CMFP.L with an annualized return of 39.85%, while CMFP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.84% annualized return.
TSLA
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -8.58%
- 6M
- -13.50%
- 1Y
- 26.39%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 39.85%
CMFP.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- 13.99%
- 6M
- 16.26%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 7.84%
TSLA vs. CMFP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -8.58% | 11.36% | 62.52% | 101.72% | -65.03% | 49.76% | 743.44% | 25.70% | 6.89% | 45.70% |
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 13.99% | 16.67% | 5.08% | -6.76% | 18.60% | 33.39% | 2.11% | 8.16% | -8.64% | 2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLA and CMFP.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2010 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLA vs. CMFP.L — Risk / Return Rank
TSLA
CMFP.L
TSLA vs. CMFP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLA | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.27 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 2.70 | -1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.02 | 7.67 | -5.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLA vs. CMFP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLA drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, roughly equal to the maximum CMFP.L drawdown of -72.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLA and CMFP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLA | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -72.10% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.93% | -8.27% | -21.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.77% | -23.04% | -30.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -23.04% | -50.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | -30.49% | -43.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.07% | -21.78% | +5.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.71% | -49.88% | +27.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.10% | 2.92% | +10.18% |
Volatility
TSLA vs. CMFP.L - Volatility Comparison
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a higher volatility of 14.34% compared to L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) at 4.25%. This indicates that TSLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMFP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLA | CMFP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.34% | 4.25% | +10.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.74% | 12.41% | +16.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.49% | 14.44% | +30.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.98% | 20.39% | +38.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.16% | 16.60% | +42.56% |
Dividends
TSLA vs. CMFP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSLA nor CMFP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLA and CMFP.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TSLA and CMFP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer