TSLA.NEO vs. AAPL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tesla Inc CDR (TSLA.NEO) and Apple Inc (AAPL).

Performance

TSLA.NEO vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Tesla Inc CDR (TSLA.NEO) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TSLA.NEO vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TSLA.NEO Tesla Inc CDR	-15.83%	7.74%	60.09%	96.92%	-65.77%	48.48%
AAPL Apple Inc	-4.69%	4.05%	41.93%	45.73%	-21.16%	23.30%

Different Trading Currencies

TSLA.NEO is traded in CAD, while AAPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAPL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap TSLA.NEO : CA$110.99B AAPL : $3.79T
EPS TSLA.NEO : CA$1.61 AAPL : $7.89
PE Ratio TSLA.NEO : 20.75 AAPL : 32.39
PS Ratio TSLA.NEO : 1.14 AAPL : 8.76
PB Ratio TSLA.NEO : 1.39 AAPL : 42.93
Total Revenue (TTM) TSLA.NEO : CA$95.63B AAPL : $435.62B
Gross Profit (TTM) TSLA.NEO : CA$16.26B AAPL : $206.16B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLA.NEO achieves a -15.83% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's -5.30% return.

TSLA.NEO

• 1D: 2.49%
• 1M: -5.81%
• YTD: -15.83%
• 6M: -18.14%
• 1Y: 38.03%
• 3Y*: 19.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAPL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.49%
• YTD: -5.30%
• 6M: -0.66%
• 1Y: 11.05%
• 3Y*: 17.12%
• 5Y*: 18.62%
• 10Y*: 26.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TSLA.NEO vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLA.NEO

TSLA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 66
TSLA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
TSLA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
TSLA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
TSLA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
TSLA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

AAPL

AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 56
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLA.NEO vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesla Inc CDR (TSLA.NEO) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLA.NEO	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	0.35	+0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	0.73	+0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.11	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	0.48	+1.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.77	1.19	+2.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLA.NEO vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLA.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLA.NEO and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLA.NEO	AAPL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	0.35	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.97	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	1.10	-0.95

Correlation

The correlation between TSLA.NEO and AAPL is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TSLA.NEO vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

TSLA.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TSLA.NEO Tesla Inc CDR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AAPL Apple Inc	0.41%	0.38%	0.40%	0.49%	0.70%	0.49%	0.61%	1.04%	1.79%	1.45%	1.93%	1.93%

Drawdowns

TSLA.NEO vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLA.NEO drawdown since its inception was -74.23%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLA.NEO and AAPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLA.NEO	AAPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.23%	-81.80%	+7.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.86%	-22.99%	-4.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.61%	-10.59%	-13.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.94%	-29.71%	-6.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.44%	7.41%	+4.03%

Volatility

TSLA.NEO vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Tesla Inc CDR (TSLA.NEO) has a higher volatility of 11.20% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.37%. This indicates that TSLA.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLA.NEO	AAPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.20%	5.37%	+5.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.68%	15.55%	+13.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.23%	31.47%	+21.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.29%	26.33%	+32.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.29%	27.87%	+31.42%

Financials

TSLA.NEO vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tesla Inc CDR and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TSLA.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tesla Inc CDR reported a gross profit of 5.05B and revenue of 28.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.0%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 69.23B and revenue of 143.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.

TSLA.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tesla Inc CDR reported an operating income of 1.86B and revenue of 28.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 50.85B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

TSLA.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tesla Inc CDR reported a net income of 1.37B and revenue of 28.10B, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 42.10B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in a net margin of 29.3%.