PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSL vs. TSMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSL vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSL achieves a -9.40% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 86.06% return.


TSL

1D
-0.11%
1M
9.37%
YTD
-9.40%
6M
-9.11%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
10Y*

TSMG

1D
-4.26%
1M
15.77%
YTD
86.06%
6M
95.35%
1Y
297.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSL vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSL and TSMG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSL vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSL
TSL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMG
TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSL vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLTSMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.46

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

8.50

-7.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.26

27.74

-26.48

TSL vs. TSMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the TSMG Sharpe Ratio of 4.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSL and TSMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLTSMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

4.18

-3.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

1.69

-1.66

Drawdowns

TSL vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, which is greater than TSMG's maximum drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and TSMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLTSMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.52%

-63.67%

-10.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.98%

-35.29%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.91%

-4.26%

-20.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-16.98%

-21.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.38%

10.79%

+5.59%

Volatility

TSL vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) is 15.25%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) has a volatility of 23.14%. This indicates that TSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLTSMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.25%

23.14%

-7.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.12%

55.07%

-20.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.94%

71.74%

-13.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.18%

81.06%

-7.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.18%

81.06%

-7.88%

TSL vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSL vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison

TSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%.


PositionTTM202520242023
TSL
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%60.47%
TSMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF
6.17%11.48%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSL and TSMG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMG has higher volatility (23.14%) compared to TSL (15.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSL dropped -74.52% vs TSMG's -63.67%.

On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 297.71% vs 20.41% for TSL. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TSL has been the lower-risk option at 15.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 297.71% return vs 20.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSL.

TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 0.00% for TSL.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSL and 0.75% for TSMG.

TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSL and TSMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer