PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSL vs. TSLW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSL vs. TSLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSL having a -9.40% return and TSLW slightly higher at -9.26%.


TSL

1D
-0.11%
1M
9.37%
YTD
-9.40%
6M
-9.11%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
10Y*

TSLW

1D
-0.18%
1M
9.09%
YTD
-9.26%
6M
-9.14%
1Y
20.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSL vs. TSLW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSL and TSLW is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025

1.00

The correlation between TSL and TSLW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSL vs. TSLW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSL
TSL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLW
TSLW Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TSLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLW Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLW Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSL vs. TSLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLTSLWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.11

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

0.57

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.26

1.29

-0.04

TSL vs. TSLW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is comparable to the TSLW Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSL and TSLW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLTSLWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

0.37

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.39

-0.35

Drawdowns

TSL vs. TSLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, which is greater than TSLW's maximum drawdown of -35.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and TSLW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLTSLWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.52%

-35.80%

-38.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.98%

-35.80%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.91%

-18.23%

-6.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-12.88%

-25.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.38%

15.77%

+0.61%

Volatility

TSL vs. TSLW - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) have volatilities of 15.25% and 14.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLTSLWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.25%

14.56%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.12%

32.83%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.94%

55.52%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.18%

55.52%

+17.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.18%

55.52%

+17.66%

TSL vs. TSLW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSL vs. TSLW - Dividend Comparison

TSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.61%.


PositionTTM202520242023
TSL
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%60.47%
TSLW
Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF
84.61%49.31%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, TSL and TSLW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSL has higher volatility (15.25%) compared to TSLW (14.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSL dropped -74.52% vs TSLW's -35.80%.

On 1-year performance, TSL leads with 20.41% vs 20.22% for TSLW. On fees, TSLW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSLW has been the lower-risk option at 14.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSL has performed better with a 20.41% return vs 20.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSL.

TSLW has the higher dividend yield at 84.61%, compared with 0.00% for TSL.

TSL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSL and 0.99% for TSLW.

TSLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSL and TSLW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer