TSL vs. TSLW
TSL (GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF) and TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSLW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSL returned 20.41% vs 20.22% for TSLW. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TSL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSLW.
Performance
TSL vs. TSLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSL having a -9.40% return and TSLW slightly higher at -9.26%.
TSL
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- -9.40%
- 6M
- -9.11%
- 1Y
- 20.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLW
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 9.09%
- YTD
- -9.26%
- 6M
- -9.14%
- 1Y
- 20.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSL vs. TSLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | -9.40% | 33.67% |
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | -9.26% | 33.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSL and TSLW is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025 | 1.00 |
The correlation between TSL and TSLW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSL vs. TSLW — Risk / Return Rank
TSL
TSLW
TSL vs. TSLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSL | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.11 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 0.57 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSL | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 0.37 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.39 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
TSL vs. TSLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, which is greater than TSLW's maximum drawdown of -35.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and TSLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSL | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.52% | -35.80% | -38.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.98% | -35.80% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.91% | -18.23% | -6.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -12.88% | -25.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.38% | 15.77% | +0.61% |
Volatility
TSL vs. TSLW - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) have volatilities of 15.25% and 14.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSL | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.25% | 14.56% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.12% | 32.83% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.94% | 55.52% | +2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.18% | 55.52% | +17.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.18% | 55.52% | +17.66% |
TSL vs. TSLW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSL vs. TSLW - Dividend Comparison
TSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.47% |
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | 84.61% | 49.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, TSL and TSLW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TSL has higher volatility (15.25%) compared to TSLW (14.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSL dropped -74.52% vs TSLW's -35.80%.
On 1-year performance, TSL leads with 20.41% vs 20.22% for TSLW. On fees, TSLW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSLW has been the lower-risk option at 14.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSL has performed better with a 20.41% return vs 20.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSL.
TSLW has the higher dividend yield at 84.61%, compared with 0.00% for TSL.
TSL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSL and 0.99% for TSLW.
TSLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSL and TSLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer