TSL vs. NVDL
TSL (GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF) and NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSL returned 20.28%/yr vs 109.72%/yr for NVDL. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSL charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDL.
Performance
TSL vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSL achieves a -9.40% return, which is significantly lower than NVDL's 19.95% return.
TSL
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- -9.40%
- 6M
- -9.11%
- 1Y
- 20.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDL
- 1D
- -7.15%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 19.95%
- 6M
- 27.27%
- 1Y
- 84.82%
- 3Y*
- 109.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSL vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | -9.40% | 3.49% | 64.12% | 113.79% | -29.24% |
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 19.95% | 32.57% | 344.58% | 432.18% | -28.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSL and NVDL is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2022 | 0.37 |
TSL vs. NVDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSL
NVDL
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSL
NVDL
Basic Materials
TSL
-
NVDL
Communication Services
TSL
-
NVDL
Consumer Defensive
TSL
-
NVDL
Energy
TSL
-
NVDL
Financial Services
TSL
-
NVDL
Healthcare
TSL
-
NVDL
Industrials
TSL
-
NVDL
Real Estate
TSL
-
NVDL
Technology
TSL
-
NVDL
Utilities
TSL
-
NVDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSL vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank
TSL
NVDL
TSL vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSL | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.23 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 2.02 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.26 | 4.63 | -3.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSL | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 1.25 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 1.77 | -1.74 |
Drawdowns
TSL vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, which is greater than NVDL's maximum drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and NVDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSL | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.52% | -67.55% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.98% | -42.23% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.30% | -67.55% | +4.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.91% | -18.19% | -6.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -16.96% | -21.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.38% | 18.39% | -2.01% |
Volatility
TSL vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) is 15.25%, while GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) has a volatility of 24.77%. This indicates that TSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSL | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.25% | 24.77% | -9.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.12% | 50.80% | -16.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.94% | 68.20% | -10.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.18% | 90.43% | -17.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.18% | 90.43% | -17.25% |
TSL vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDL's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSL vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSL nor NVDL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.29% |
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSL and NVDL have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDL has higher volatility (24.77%) compared to TSL (15.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSL dropped -74.52% vs NVDL's -67.55%.
On 3-year performance, NVDL leads with 109.72% vs 20.28% for TSL. On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, TSL has been the lower-risk option at 15.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NVDL has performed better with a 109.72% return vs 20.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDL is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSL.
TSL and NVDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSL and 1.05% for NVDL.
NVDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSL and NVDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer