TSL vs. MVLL
TSL (GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. TSL is actively managed, while MVLL is passively managed. Over the past year, TSL returned 20.41% vs 1215.17% for MVLL. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSL charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.
Performance
TSL vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSL achieves a -9.40% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 842.68% return.
TSL
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- -9.40%
- 6M
- -9.11%
- 1Y
- 20.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVLL
- 1D
- 7.14%
- 1M
- 201.84%
- YTD
- 842.68%
- 6M
- 558.01%
- 1Y
- 1,215.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSL vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | -9.40% | 79.81% |
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 842.68% | -10.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSL and MVLL is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025 | 0.39 |
TSL vs. MVLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSL
MVLL
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSL
MVLL
-
Basic Materials
TSL
-
MVLL
-
Communication Services
TSL
-
MVLL
-
Consumer Defensive
TSL
-
MVLL
-
Energy
TSL
-
MVLL
-
Financial Services
TSL
-
MVLL
-
Healthcare
TSL
-
MVLL
-
Industrials
TSL
-
MVLL
-
Real Estate
TSL
-
MVLL
-
Technology
TSL
-
MVLL
Utilities
TSL
-
MVLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSL vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank
TSL
MVLL
TSL vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSL | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.63 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 25.11 | -24.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.26 | 52.27 | -51.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSL | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 9.23 | -8.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 3.33 | -3.30 |
Drawdowns
TSL vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and MVLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSL | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.52% | -59.02% | -15.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.98% | -48.93% | +11.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.91% | 0.00% | -24.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -22.42% | -16.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.38% | 23.46% | -7.08% |
Volatility
TSL vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) is 15.25%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 60.78%. This indicates that TSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSL | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.25% | 60.78% | -45.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.12% | 96.08% | -61.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.94% | 133.11% | -75.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.18% | 139.63% | -66.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.18% | 139.63% | -66.45% |
TSL vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSL vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSL nor MVLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSL and MVLL have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVLL has higher volatility (60.78%) compared to TSL (15.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSL dropped -74.52% vs MVLL's -59.02%.
On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1215.17% vs 20.41% for TSL. On fees, TSL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, TSL has been the lower-risk option at 15.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1215.17% return vs 20.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.
TSL and MVLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSL and 1.50% for MVLL.
MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.23 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSL and MVLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer