TSII vs. NIOG
TSII (REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF) and NIOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TSII is actively managed, while NIOG is passively managed. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TSII charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NIOG.
Performance
TSII vs. NIOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSII achieves a -35.03% return, which is significantly lower than NIOG's -27.56% return.
TSII
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -22.61%
- 6M
- -32.70%
- YTD
- -35.03%
- 1Y
- -2.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -8.22%
NIOG
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- 6M
- -13.06%
- YTD
- -27.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $119.34K | $154.91K | $404.59K | |
| $1.63M | $1.31M | $1.07M |
TSII vs. NIOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF | -35.03% | -4.49% |
NIOG Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF | -27.56% | 3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSII and NIOG is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSII vs. NIOG — Risk / Return Rank
TSII
NIOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSII vs. NIOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSII | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSII vs. NIOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSII drawdown since its inception was -44.14%, smaller than the maximum NIOG drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSII and NIOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSII | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.14% | -61.79% | +17.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.63% | -54.61% | +13.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -27.99% | +16.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.75% | — | — |
Volatility
TSII vs. NIOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSII | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.70% | 109.44% | -61.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.45% | 109.44% | -58.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.45% | 109.44% | -58.99% |
TSII vs. NIOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than NIOG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSII vs. NIOG - Dividend Comparison
TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.28%, while NIOG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NIOG Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF | 109.28% | 32.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSII and NIOG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NIOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NIOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSII.
TSII has the higher dividend yield at 109.28%, compared with 0.00% for NIOG.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSII and 0.75% for NIOG.
Find the right allocation for TSII and NIOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer