PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSII vs. FLYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSII vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSII achieves a -6.73% return, which is significantly higher than FLYD's -11.20% return.


TSII

1D
0.32%
1M
6.19%
YTD
-6.73%
6M
-7.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLYD

1D
3.25%
1M
-18.38%
YTD
-11.20%
6M
-19.27%
1Y
-48.13%
3Y*
-55.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSII vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSII and FLYD is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

-0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSII vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSII

FLYD
FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSII vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TSII vs. FLYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSIIFLYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

-0.75

+1.49

Drawdowns

TSII vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSII drawdown since its inception was -29.03%, smaller than the maximum FLYD drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSII and FLYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSIIFLYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.03%

-98.11%

+69.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.76%

-97.95%

+83.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.31%

-83.12%

+73.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.06%

Volatility

TSII vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSIIFLYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.04%

74.47%

-28.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.04%

83.70%

-37.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.04%

83.70%

-37.66%

TSII vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FLYD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSII vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison

TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.30%, while FLYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSII and FLYD have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLYD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLYD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSII.

TSII has the higher dividend yield at 70.30%, compared with 0.00% for FLYD.

TSII is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FLYD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSII and 0.95% for FLYD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSII and FLYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer