PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSI vs. PAXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSI vs. PAXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Strategic Income Fund Inc. (TSI) and PIMCO Access Income Fund (PAXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSI achieves a -6.74% return, which is significantly lower than PAXS's -1.99% return.


TSI

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
-6.74%
6M
-4.77%
1Y
-1.89%
3Y*
6.86%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
5.03%

PAXS

1D
0.57%
1M
1.64%
YTD
-1.99%
6M
-3.07%
1Y
5.03%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSI vs. PAXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TSI
TCW Strategic Income Fund Inc.
-6.74%9.72%13.45%7.13%-8.80%
PAXS
PIMCO Access Income Fund
-1.99%12.58%19.51%9.30%-16.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TSI and PAXS is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.21

The correlation between TSI and PAXS shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSI vs. PAXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSI
TSI Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
TSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

PAXS
PAXS Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PAXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXS Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSI vs. PAXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Strategic Income Fund Inc. (TSI) and PIMCO Access Income Fund (PAXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSIPAXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.09

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

0.42

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.52

1.10

-1.62

TSI vs. PAXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSI Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the PAXS Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSI and PAXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSI vs. PAXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSI drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than PAXS's maximum drawdown of -22.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSI and PAXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSIPAXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.35%

-22.28%

-38.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-12.10%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.30%

-13.40%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.78%

-7.27%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-7.55%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

4.60%

-0.96%

Volatility

TSI vs. PAXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCW Strategic Income Fund Inc. (TSI) is 1.48%, while PIMCO Access Income Fund (PAXS) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that TSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSIPAXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

3.22%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.29%

9.77%

-2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.38%

12.17%

-3.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.89%

17.38%

-6.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.03%

17.38%

-3.35%

Dividends

TSI vs. PAXS - Dividend Comparison

TSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, less than PAXS's 12.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAXS
PIMCO Access Income Fund
12.70%11.72%11.76%12.54%13.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSI
TCW Strategic Income Fund Inc.
9.19%6.58%8.00%7.73%7.00%6.36%4.83%7.39%7.07%5.36%5.21%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSI and PAXS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAXS has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to TSI (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSI dropped -60.35% vs PAXS's -22.28%.

PAXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSI and PAXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer