PAXS vs. CDX
PAXS (PIMCO Access Income Fund) and CDX (Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF) are both funds - PAXS is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO, while CDX is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PAXS returned 12.35%/yr vs 7.24%/yr for CDX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PAXS vs. CDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAXS achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly higher than CDX's -2.25% return.
PAXS
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- -0.63%
- 6M
- -4.36%
- 1Y
- 7.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- -2.25%
- 6M
- -2.61%
- 1Y
- -1.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAXS vs. CDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAXS PIMCO Access Income Fund | -0.63% | 12.58% | 19.51% | 9.30% | -16.66% |
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | -2.25% | 9.51% | 7.71% | 12.74% | -8.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAXS and CDX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2022 | 0.27 |
The correlation between PAXS and CDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAXS vs. CDX — Risk / Return Rank
PAXS
CDX
PAXS vs. CDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Access Income Fund (PAXS) and Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAXS | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | -0.30 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.92 | -0.39 | +1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.95 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | -0.43 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | -1.02 | +2.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAXS | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | -0.30 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.38 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
PAXS vs. CDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAXS drawdown since its inception was -22.28%, which is greater than CDX's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXS and CDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAXS | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.28% | -13.24% | -9.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.10% | -4.18% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.40% | -8.88% | -4.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.98% | -7.23% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -4.33% | -3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 1.76% | +2.47% |
Volatility
PAXS vs. CDX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Access Income Fund (PAXS) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) at 1.61%. This indicates that PAXS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAXS | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 1.61% | +1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.63% | 4.75% | +4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 5.69% | +6.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 11.11% | +6.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 11.11% | +6.36% |
Dividends
PAXS vs. CDX - Dividend Comparison
PAXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.39%, more than CDX's 8.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDX Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF | 8.35% | 7.18% | 12.60% | 5.26% | 7.51% |
PAXS PIMCO Access Income Fund | 12.39% | 11.72% | 11.76% | 12.54% | 13.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAXS and CDX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAXS has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to CDX (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAXS dropped -22.28% vs CDX's -13.24%.
PAXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAXS and CDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer