PAXS vs. CDX
PAXS (PIMCO Access Income Fund) and CDX (Simplify High Yield ETF) are both funds - PAXS is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO, while CDX is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PAXS returned 10.95%/yr vs 7.17%/yr for CDX. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PAXS vs. CDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAXS achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly higher than CDX's -3.00% return.
PAXS
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- 6M
- -6.06%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 1.79%
- 3Y*
- 10.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.45%
CDX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- -3.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.23M | $2.17M | $2.98M | |
| $2.58M | $2.33M | $2.69M |
PAXS vs. CDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAXS PIMCO Access Income Fund | -0.71% | 12.58% | 19.51% | 9.30% | -16.66% |
CDX Simplify High Yield ETF | -3.00% | 9.51% | 7.71% | 12.74% | -8.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAXS and CDX is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAXS vs. CDX — Risk / Return Rank
PAXS
CDX
PAXS vs. CDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Access Income Fund (PAXS) and Simplify High Yield ETF (CDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAXS | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.92 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | -0.60 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.49 | -1.44 | +1.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAXS vs. CDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAXS drawdown since its inception was -22.28%, which is greater than CDX's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXS and CDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAXS | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.28% | -13.24% | -9.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.10% | -5.37% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.40% | -8.97% | -4.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.06% | -7.94% | +1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.49% | -4.44% | -3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 2.24% | +2.64% |
Volatility
PAXS vs. CDX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Access Income Fund (PAXS) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to Simplify High Yield ETF (CDX) at 2.02%. This indicates that PAXS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAXS | CDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 2.02% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | 5.16% | +4.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 5.98% | +6.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 10.97% | +6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 10.97% | +6.29% |
Dividends
PAXS vs. CDX - Dividend Comparison
PAXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.66%, more than CDX's 8.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDX Simplify High Yield ETF | 8.33% | 7.18% | 12.60% | 5.26% | 7.51% |
PAXS PIMCO Access Income Fund | 12.66% | 11.72% | 11.76% | 12.54% | 13.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAXS and CDX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAXS has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to CDX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAXS dropped -22.28% vs CDX's -13.24%.
PAXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAXS and CDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer