TSI vs. CBRDX
TSI (TCW Strategic Income Fund Inc.) and CBRDX (CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, TSI returned 6.86%/yr vs 5.96%/yr for CBRDX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSI vs. CBRDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSI achieves a -6.74% return, which is significantly lower than CBRDX's 0.27% return.
TSI
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- -6.74%
- 6M
- -4.77%
- 1Y
- -1.89%
- 3Y*
- 6.86%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 5.03%
CBRDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSI vs. CBRDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSI TCW Strategic Income Fund Inc. | -6.74% | 9.72% | 13.45% | 7.13% | -14.33% | 3.31% |
CBRDX CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund | 0.27% | 5.01% | 7.21% | 8.00% | 1.49% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSI and CBRDX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSI vs. CBRDX — Risk / Return Rank
TSI
CBRDX
TSI vs. CBRDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Strategic Income Fund Inc. (TSI) and CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund (CBRDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSI | CBRDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.45 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 3.05 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 7.82 | -8.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSI vs. CBRDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSI drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than CBRDX's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSI and CBRDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSI | CBRDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.35% | -2.46% | -57.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -1.05% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.30% | -2.46% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.78% | -0.94% | -5.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -0.35% | -7.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 0.41% | +3.23% |
Volatility
TSI vs. CBRDX - Volatility Comparison
TCW Strategic Income Fund Inc. (TSI) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund (CBRDX) at 0.69%. This indicates that TSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBRDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSI | CBRDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 0.69% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 1.35% | +5.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.38% | 1.82% | +6.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.89% | 2.07% | +8.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 2.07% | +11.96% |
Dividends
TSI vs. CBRDX - Dividend Comparison
TSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, more than CBRDX's 6.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBRDX CrossingBridge Responsible Credit Fund | 6.63% | 7.52% | 8.57% | 8.57% | 6.67% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSI TCW Strategic Income Fund Inc. | 9.19% | 6.58% | 8.00% | 7.73% | 7.00% | 6.36% | 4.83% | 7.39% | 7.07% | 5.36% | 5.21% | 4.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSI and CBRDX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSI has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to CBRDX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSI dropped -60.35% vs CBRDX's -2.46%.
CBRDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSI and CBRDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer