TSGGX vs. WWWEX

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

TSGGX (TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund) and WWWEX (Kinetics The Global Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, TSGGX returned 10.49%/yr vs 15.22%/yr for WWWEX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSGGX charges 0.08%/yr vs 1.39%/yr for WWWEX.

Performance

TSGGX vs. WWWEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and Kinetics The Global Fund (WWWEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSGGX achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly higher than WWWEX's 0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, TSGGX has underperformed WWWEX with an annualized return of 10.49%, while WWWEX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.22% annualized return.

TSGGX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 7.10%
• 6M: 6.42%
• 1Y: 17.51%
• 3Y*: 15.61%
• 5Y*: 7.34%
• 10Y*: 10.49%

WWWEX

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -8.05%
• YTD: 0.25%
• 6M: -0.16%
• 1Y: -3.99%
• 3Y*: 28.02%
• 5Y*: 12.98%
• 10Y*: 15.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSGGX vs. WWWEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TSGGX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund	7.10%	17.42%	12.98%	19.45%	-18.19%	13.49%	17.44%	23.66%	-9.29%	18.11%
WWWEX Kinetics The Global Fund	0.25%	2.89%	72.15%	11.83%	-6.45%	16.29%	25.00%	21.61%	-23.57%	48.93%

Correlation

The correlation between TSGGX and WWWEX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2011	0.58

The correlation between TSGGX and WWWEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSGGX vs. WWWEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSGGX

TSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 47
TSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
TSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
TSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
TSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
TSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

WWWEX

WWWEX Risk / Return Rank: 2
WWWEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
WWWEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
WWWEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
WWWEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
WWWEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSGGX vs. WWWEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and Kinetics The Global Fund (WWWEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSGGX	WWWEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	-0.18	+1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	-0.13	+2.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	0.98	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	-0.22	+2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.29	-0.52	+9.81

TSGGX vs. WWWEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSGGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the WWWEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSGGX and WWWEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSGGX vs. WWWEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSGGX drawdown since its inception was -29.75%, smaller than the maximum WWWEX drawdown of -82.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSGGX and WWWEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSGGX	WWWEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.75%	-82.60%	+52.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.60%	-13.86%	+5.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.88%	-17.66%	+3.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.86%	-26.62%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.75%	-36.00%	+6.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-13.53%	+12.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-41.24%	+37.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	5.90%	-3.89%

Volatility

TSGGX vs. WWWEX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and Kinetics The Global Fund (WWWEX) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSGGX	WWWEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	4.43%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.40%	13.49%	-4.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.30%	17.12%	-5.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.35%	19.54%	-6.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.18%	19.22%	-5.04%

TSGGX vs. WWWEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSGGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than WWWEX's 1.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSGGX vs. WWWEX - Dividend Comparison

TSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than WWWEX's 2.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TSGGX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund	6.66%	7.14%	2.83%	2.34%	8.15%	11.10%	6.38%	4.81%	5.33%	0.63%	3.82%	5.13%
WWWEX Kinetics The Global Fund	2.57%	2.58%	0.98%	2.50%	1.47%	3.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	9.04%	0.40%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSGGX and WWWEX in my portfolio?

TSGGX and WWWEX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSGGX or WWWEX?

TSGGX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to WWWEX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSGGX dropped -29.75% vs WWWEX's -82.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSGGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.