TSGB.L vs. PRWU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TSGB.L (VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A) and PRWU.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from VanEck and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSGB.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRWU.L.

Performance

TSGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSGB.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

TSGB.L is traded in GBP, while PRWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRWU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

TSGB.L

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 4.90%
• YTD: 12.75%
• 6M: 13.89%
• 1Y: 28.93%
• 3Y*: 17.68%
• 5Y*: 12.11%
• 10Y*: —

PRWU.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TSGB.L VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A	12.75%	19.46%	12.13%	14.14%	3.40%
PRWU.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)	0.00%	0.00%	20.63%	18.25%	1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TSGB.L and PRWU.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	0.57

The correlation between TSGB.L and PRWU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

TSGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TSGB.L	PRWU.L
Financial Services	29.4%	15.8%
Technology	23.6%	27.0%
Healthcare	12.7%	10.7%
Industrials	11.7%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	10.5%
Communication Services	7.0%	8.1%
Basic Materials	2.7%	3.2%
Real Estate	2.6%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	6.1%
Utilities	1.1%	2.7%
Energy	0.4%	4.0%

Return for Risk

TSGB.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSGB.L

TSGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 75
TSGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
TSGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
TSGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 79
TSGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
TSGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A (TSGB.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSGB.L	PRWU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.99	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSGB.L	PRWU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	TSGB.L	PRWU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.41%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSGB.L	PRWU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.65%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.04%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.92%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.93%	—	—

TSGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSGB.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TSGB.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

TSGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, while PRWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PRWU.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TSGB.L VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF A	2.11%	2.23%	2.63%	2.56%	2.67%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSGB.L and PRWU.L in my portfolio?

TSGB.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSGB.L or PRWU.L?

On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSGB.L or PRWU.L?

PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TSGB.L.

What is the main difference between TSGB.L and PRWU.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TSGB.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.