PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSEC vs. ZTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSEC vs. ZTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Securitized Income ETF (TSEC) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSEC achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than ZTWO's 0.89% return.


TSEC

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.95%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZTWO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.89%
6M
1.21%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSEC vs. ZTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSEC
Touchstone Securitized Income ETF
1.26%7.47%0.23%
ZTWO
F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.89%5.49%0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between TSEC and ZTWO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.34

The correlation between TSEC and ZTWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSEC vs. ZTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSEC
TSEC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ZTWO
ZTWO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ZTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSEC vs. ZTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Securitized Income ETF (TSEC) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSECZTWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.64

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

4.32

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.93

20.46

-8.53

TSEC vs. ZTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the ZTWO Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSEC and ZTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSECZTWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

3.09

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.59

3.16

-0.57

Drawdowns

TSEC vs. ZTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSEC drawdown since its inception was -1.78%, which is greater than ZTWO's maximum drawdown of -0.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSEC and ZTWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSECZTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-0.93%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.67%

-0.93%

-0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.11%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-0.10%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

0.20%

+0.31%

Volatility

TSEC vs. ZTWO - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Securitized Income ETF (TSEC) has a higher volatility of 0.53% compared to F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) at 0.42%. This indicates that TSEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSECZTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

0.42%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.07%

0.97%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70%

1.31%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.90%

1.49%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.90%

1.49%

+1.41%

TSEC vs. ZTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSEC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTWO's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSEC vs. ZTWO - Dividend Comparison

TSEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.30%, more than ZTWO's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
TSEC
Touchstone Securitized Income ETF
7.30%6.47%5.83%2.86%
ZTWO
F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.12%4.31%0.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSEC and ZTWO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSEC has higher volatility (0.53%) compared to ZTWO (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSEC dropped -1.78% vs ZTWO's -0.93%.

On 1-year performance, TSEC leads with 6.08% vs 4.02% for ZTWO. On fees, ZTWO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ZTWO has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSEC has performed better with a 6.08% return vs 4.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZTWO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TSEC.

TSEC has the higher dividend yield at 7.30%, compared with 4.12% for ZTWO.

They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TSEC and 0.15% for ZTWO.

ZTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSEC and ZTWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer